Learning to discriminate by learning to generate: zero-shot generative models increase human object recognition alignment

How does the human visual system recognize objects---through discriminative inference (fast but potentially unreliable) or using a generative model of the world (slow but potentially more robust)? The question of how the brain combines the best of both worlds to achieve fast and robust inference has been termed "the deep mystery of vision" (Kriegeskorte 2015). Yet most of today's leading computational models of human vision are simply based on discriminative inference, such as convolutional neural networks or vision transformers trained on object recognition. In contrast, we here revisit the concept of vision as generative inference. This idea dates back to the notion of vision as unconscious inference proposed by Helmholtz (1867), who hypothesized that the brain uses a generative model of the world to infer probable causes of sensory input. In order to build a generative model capable of recognizing objects, we take some of the world's most powerful generative text-to-image models (Stable Diffusion, Imagen and Parti) and turn them into zero-shot image classifiers using Bayesian inference. We then compare those generative classifiers against a broad range of discriminative classifiers and against human psychophysical object recognition data from the "model-vs-human" toolbox (Geirhos et al. 2021). We discover four emergent properties of generative classifiers: They show a record-breaking human-like shape bias (99% for Imagen), near human-level accuracy on challenging distorted images, and state-of-the-art alignment with human classification errors. Last but not least, generative classifiers understand certain perceptual illusions such as the famous bistable rabbit-duck illusion or Giuseppe Arcimboldo's portrait of a man's face composed entirely of vegetables, speaking to their ability to discern ambiguous input and distinguish local from global information. Taken together, our results indicate that while the current dominant paradigm for modeling human object recognition is discriminative inference, zero-shot generative models approximate human object recognition data remarkably well.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.132
Primary Topic
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning to discriminate by learning to generate: zero-shot generative models increase human object recognition alignment

Priyank Jaini, Kevin Clark, Robert Geirhos
Journal of Vision
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
article

Learning to discriminate by learning to generate: zero-shot generative models increase human object recognition alignment

Priyank Jaini, Kevin Clark, Robert Geirhos
article en

Abstract

How does the human visual system recognize objects---through discriminative inference (fast but potentially unreliable) or using a generative model of the world (slow but potentially more robust)? The question of how the brain combines the best of both worlds to achieve fast and robust inference has been termed "the deep mystery of vision" (Kriegeskorte 2015). Yet most of today's leading computational models of human vision are simply based on discriminative inference, such as convolutional neural networks or vision transformers trained on object recognition. In contrast, we here revisit the concept of vision as generative inference. This idea dates back to the notion of vision as unconscious inference proposed by Helmholtz (1867), who hypothesized that the brain uses a generative model of the world to infer probable causes of sensory input. In order to build a generative model capable of recognizing objects, we take some of the world's most powerful generative text-to-image models (Stable Diffusion, Imagen and Parti) and turn them into zero-shot image classifiers using Bayesian inference. We then compare those generative classifiers against a broad range of discriminative classifiers and against human psychophysical object recognition data from the "model-vs-human" toolbox (Geirhos et al. 2021). We discover four emergent properties of generative classifiers: They show a record-breaking human-like shape bias (99% for Imagen), near human-level accuracy on challenging distorted images, and state-of-the-art alignment with human classification errors. Last but not least, generative classifiers understand certain perceptual illusions such as the famous bistable rabbit-duck illusion or Giuseppe Arcimboldo's portrait of a man's face composed entirely of vegetables, speaking to their ability to discern ambiguous input and distinguish local from global information. Taken together, our results indicate that while the current dominant paradigm for modeling human object recognition is discriminative inference, zero-shot generative models approximate human object recognition data remarkably well.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Google (United States) (US), Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.