Combining surface reflectance and motion cues in peripheral target detection

Humans are able to search for a target in cluttered scenes more easily when it contrasts with its background. However, the way in which humans combine different visual cues to detect a pop-out target is not fully understood, particularly for peripheral viewing in displays with partial occlusions and clutter. Here, we focus on surface reflectance and motion. Inspired by so-called “dead-leaves stimuli”, we present an array of ellipses with different surface reflectance (luminance and color) and motion features, and define a target as a group of spatially-localized leaves with similar visual properties as the background leaves except for the cues of interest. A trial could contain a target defined by a single cue, a target defined by two cues jointly, or two targets each defined by a single cue, leading to single-cue, cue-combination, or cue-conflict conditions. Participants clicked on the center of the target with a mouse if they detected it, or right clicked if they detected nothing. A pre-experiment using a staircase procedure was used to titrate the cue difficulty before the formal experiment. If humans independently combine the two cues in the detection task, the cue-conflict condition should be as easy as the cue-combination condition, and better than single-cue conditions. Alternatively, if humans sum information from both cues for detection, the cue-combination but not the cue-conflict condition should outperform single-cue conditions. Results showed that the presence of both cues lead to improved performance compared with single-cue conditions, with better detectability in the cue-combination than the cue-conflict condition. However, given that participants could detect either of the two targets in the cue-conflict condition, the presence of both cues also drove additional accuracy improvement than expected by pure summation. The combination of surface reflectance and motion is overall better explained by a summation model than an independent-combination model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.309
Primary Topic
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining surface reflectance and motion cues in peripheral target detection

Yunyan Duan, Thomas S. A. Wallis, Swantje Mahncke
Journal of Vision
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
article

Combining surface reflectance and motion cues in peripheral target detection

Yunyan Duan, Thomas S. A. Wallis, Swantje Mahncke
article en

Abstract

Humans are able to search for a target in cluttered scenes more easily when it contrasts with its background. However, the way in which humans combine different visual cues to detect a pop-out target is not fully understood, particularly for peripheral viewing in displays with partial occlusions and clutter. Here, we focus on surface reflectance and motion. Inspired by so-called “dead-leaves stimuli”, we present an array of ellipses with different surface reflectance (luminance and color) and motion features, and define a target as a group of spatially-localized leaves with similar visual properties as the background leaves except for the cues of interest. A trial could contain a target defined by a single cue, a target defined by two cues jointly, or two targets each defined by a single cue, leading to single-cue, cue-combination, or cue-conflict conditions. Participants clicked on the center of the target with a mouse if they detected it, or right clicked if they detected nothing. A pre-experiment using a staircase procedure was used to titrate the cue difficulty before the formal experiment. If humans independently combine the two cues in the detection task, the cue-conflict condition should be as easy as the cue-combination condition, and better than single-cue conditions. Alternatively, if humans sum information from both cues for detection, the cue-combination but not the cue-conflict condition should outperform single-cue conditions. Results showed that the presence of both cues lead to improved performance compared with single-cue conditions, with better detectability in the cue-combination than the cue-conflict condition. However, given that participants could detect either of the two targets in the cue-conflict condition, the presence of both cues also drove additional accuracy improvement than expected by pure summation. The combination of surface reflectance and motion is overall better explained by a summation model than an independent-combination model.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Combining surface reflectance and motion cues in peripheral target detection — Yunyan Duan, Thomas S. A. Wallis, et al. · Journal of Vision (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS