Examining the influence of cognitive processing orientation on tracking performance using a modified multiple object tracking task

Extensive research on multiple-object tracking (MOT) has shown that task performance may be influenced by both object-related and task-irrelevant factors (Meyerhoff, Papenmeier, & Huff, 2017). While some research suggests that certain expertise might be associated with more efficient tracking (Allen, McGeorge, Pearson, & Milne, 2004; Green & Bavelier, 2006), the question of how to consistently improve performance across individuals remains uncertain. The present study explores whether maintaining a wider attentional scope could enhance tracking abilities using a novel dual task paradigm. Participants tracked a number of moving targets (ranging 2-4) while performing a simultaneous secondary probe-detection task. While objects are in motion, a number of probes may appear on any of the moving objects (i.e., targets & distractors). In the global task condition, participants were instructed to respond only when probes appeared simultaneously on all tracking targets. This aims to prompt global processing by requiring participants to attend to the overall structure of the display to detect all probes at once. In the local task condition, participants were instructed to respond whenever a probe appeared on any tracking target. This aims to prompt local processing by directing participants to attend to individual objects within the display. It was observed that while tracking accuracy decreased as number of tracking targets increased, adopting a global processing orientation is associated with more efficient tracking performance than local processing orientation, especially with larger tracking sets. These results suggest that maintaining a broader attentional focus might efficiently improve tracking efficiency in dynamic scenes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.453
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the influence of cognitive processing orientation on tracking performance using a modified multiple object tracking task

Michael D. Dodd, Mengzhu Fu
Journal of Vision
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Examining the influence of cognitive processing orientation on tracking performance using a modified multiple object tracking task

Michael D. Dodd, Mengzhu Fu
article en

Abstract

Extensive research on multiple-object tracking (MOT) has shown that task performance may be influenced by both object-related and task-irrelevant factors (Meyerhoff, Papenmeier, & Huff, 2017). While some research suggests that certain expertise might be associated with more efficient tracking (Allen, McGeorge, Pearson, & Milne, 2004; Green & Bavelier, 2006), the question of how to consistently improve performance across individuals remains uncertain. The present study explores whether maintaining a wider attentional scope could enhance tracking abilities using a novel dual task paradigm. Participants tracked a number of moving targets (ranging 2-4) while performing a simultaneous secondary probe-detection task. While objects are in motion, a number of probes may appear on any of the moving objects (i.e., targets & distractors). In the global task condition, participants were instructed to respond only when probes appeared simultaneously on all tracking targets. This aims to prompt global processing by requiring participants to attend to the overall structure of the display to detect all probes at once. In the local task condition, participants were instructed to respond whenever a probe appeared on any tracking target. This aims to prompt local processing by directing participants to attend to individual objects within the display. It was observed that while tracking accuracy decreased as number of tracking targets increased, adopting a global processing orientation is associated with more efficient tracking performance than local processing orientation, especially with larger tracking sets. These results suggest that maintaining a broader attentional focus might efficiently improve tracking efficiency in dynamic scenes.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Shippensburg University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.