Peripheral Crowding Magnitude is Similar Under Photopic and Scotopic Luminance Conditions

Visual crowding is the inability to distinguish a stimulus (target) in the presence of surrounding objects (flankers) and impacts various visual functions. Some of these functions are influenced by the luminance level of the environment, such as visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity. However, the potential interactions between crowding and luminance remain unclear. In this study, we explored the magnitude of crowding under five different luminance conditions, ranging from photopic to scotopic levels. Eight participants were asked to report the orientation of the gap in a white Landolt-C (2°diameter) on a gray background positioned at 10° eccentricity. The target Landolt-C was either presented alone or flanked by four Landolt-C’s (2°diameter) placed at one of five center-to-center distances (2°,2.52°,3.22°,4.18°,5.5°). Participants responded by adjusting the orientation of a reference Landolt-C gap (5°diameter) placed at 0° eccentricity. Goggles with neutral density filters were used to manipulate stimulus luminance (0.02 to 200 cd/m²). Landolt-C gap sizes were individually adjusted to equalize acuity performance at isolated levels across luminance conditions. Participants' perceptual error (PE) was calculated based on the difference between their response and the actual orientation of the target gap. Crowding magnitude was defined as PE flanked - PE isolated for each luminance and distance conditions. Results showed that crowding magnitude was similar under all luminance conditions (BF10=0.23), while a monotonous decrease in crowding magnitude was revealed as the target-flanker distance increased in all luminance conditions. Moreover, participants’ PEs were similar in all isolated conditions, confirming similar acuity performances (BF10=0.18). Our results support the idea that the same neural mechanisms operate under scotopic and photopic conditions for peripheral crowding. Additionally, our results align with prior research on contour interaction in scotopic conditions, suggesting a shared underlying process between contour interaction and crowding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.511
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peripheral Crowding Magnitude is Similar Under Photopic and Scotopic Luminance Conditions

Nomdo M. Jansonius, Dilce Tanriverdi, Frans W. Cornelissen
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Peripheral Crowding Magnitude is Similar Under Photopic and Scotopic Luminance Conditions

Nomdo M. Jansonius, Dilce Tanriverdi, Frans W. Cornelissen
article en

Abstract

Visual crowding is the inability to distinguish a stimulus (target) in the presence of surrounding objects (flankers) and impacts various visual functions. Some of these functions are influenced by the luminance level of the environment, such as visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity. However, the potential interactions between crowding and luminance remain unclear. In this study, we explored the magnitude of crowding under five different luminance conditions, ranging from photopic to scotopic levels. Eight participants were asked to report the orientation of the gap in a white Landolt-C (2°diameter) on a gray background positioned at 10° eccentricity. The target Landolt-C was either presented alone or flanked by four Landolt-C’s (2°diameter) placed at one of five center-to-center distances (2°,2.52°,3.22°,4.18°,5.5°). Participants responded by adjusting the orientation of a reference Landolt-C gap (5°diameter) placed at 0° eccentricity. Goggles with neutral density filters were used to manipulate stimulus luminance (0.02 to 200 cd/m²). Landolt-C gap sizes were individually adjusted to equalize acuity performance at isolated levels across luminance conditions. Participants' perceptual error (PE) was calculated based on the difference between their response and the actual orientation of the target gap. Crowding magnitude was defined as PE flanked - PE isolated for each luminance and distance conditions. Results showed that crowding magnitude was similar under all luminance conditions (BF10=0.23), while a monotonous decrease in crowding magnitude was revealed as the target-flanker distance increased in all luminance conditions. Moreover, participants’ PEs were similar in all isolated conditions, confirming similar acuity performances (BF10=0.18). Our results support the idea that the same neural mechanisms operate under scotopic and photopic conditions for peripheral crowding. Additionally, our results align with prior research on contour interaction in scotopic conditions, suggesting a shared underlying process between contour interaction and crowding.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Climate action, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.