A Comparative Analysis of the Use of Computer-aided Detection Systems with Mock Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Sets

Computer-aided detection (CAD) systems are essential tools for aiding radiologists in assessing breast images for cancer. Despite their widespread use, limited research has compared the various types of CAD systems, particularly for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) imaging, which is anticipated to surpass mammography in use. Additionally, calls for including global classifications in CAD systems, particularly the Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS), suggest such ratings may enhance diagnostic accuracy (Qian et al., 2015). This study examined three existing CAD system types (binary, analog, and interactive); a novel CAD system with a global classification (BI-RADS); and a control with no CAD system. Undergraduate students (N = 50) were randomly assigned to these conditions and tasked with identifying a target (T) among distractors (Ls) in mock DBT displays. For each trial, stimuli were randomly distributed across 13 layers to mimic the pseudo-3D images of DBT sets. Assistance provided to participants in the automation conditions varied by CAD type: binary CAD circled likely targets; BI-RADS CAD supplied a rating and descriptor indicating the presence of a target; analog CAD circled potential targets and provided probability estimates; and interactive CAD (iCAD) required participant activation on each trial to reveal an analog CAD overlay. Results revealed that participants in the binary and analog conditions exhibited an average 39% increase in hit rate and a 16.59s decrease in response times compared to the control, BI-RADS, and iCAD conditions. Notably, participants in the BI-RADS and iCAD conditions did not significantly differ from the control condition or each other. While iCAD and BI-RADS are considered advancements in CAD technology, this research suggests that further investigation into their influence on search performance is necessary before replacing the widely used binary and analog CAD systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.440
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of the Use of Computer-aided Detection Systems with Mock Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Sets

Dawn M. Sarno, Katharine E. Sabo
Journal of Vision
AI in cancer detection
article

A Comparative Analysis of the Use of Computer-aided Detection Systems with Mock Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Sets

Dawn M. Sarno, Katharine E. Sabo
article en

Abstract

Computer-aided detection (CAD) systems are essential tools for aiding radiologists in assessing breast images for cancer. Despite their widespread use, limited research has compared the various types of CAD systems, particularly for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) imaging, which is anticipated to surpass mammography in use. Additionally, calls for including global classifications in CAD systems, particularly the Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS), suggest such ratings may enhance diagnostic accuracy (Qian et al., 2015). This study examined three existing CAD system types (binary, analog, and interactive); a novel CAD system with a global classification (BI-RADS); and a control with no CAD system. Undergraduate students (N = 50) were randomly assigned to these conditions and tasked with identifying a target (T) among distractors (Ls) in mock DBT displays. For each trial, stimuli were randomly distributed across 13 layers to mimic the pseudo-3D images of DBT sets. Assistance provided to participants in the automation conditions varied by CAD type: binary CAD circled likely targets; BI-RADS CAD supplied a rating and descriptor indicating the presence of a target; analog CAD circled potential targets and provided probability estimates; and interactive CAD (iCAD) required participant activation on each trial to reveal an analog CAD overlay. Results revealed that participants in the binary and analog conditions exhibited an average 39% increase in hit rate and a 16.59s decrease in response times compared to the control, BI-RADS, and iCAD conditions. Notably, participants in the BI-RADS and iCAD conditions did not significantly differ from the control condition or each other. While iCAD and BI-RADS are considered advancements in CAD technology, this research suggests that further investigation into their influence on search performance is necessary before replacing the widely used binary and analog CAD systems.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.