Comparative study on sensitivity analysis of transient vibration response in topology optimization

This paper investigates and summarizes the sensitivity analysis of transient vibration response in topological optimization problems. Firstly, the finite element calculation process of the transient vibration response based on the Newmark method is given. On this basis, the sensitivity formulae of the vibration response objective function to the element pseudo-density are derived using the finite difference method (FDM), the direct differential method (DDM), and the adjoint variable method (AVM). Numerical examples show that AVM has the same calculation accuracy as the DDM, while the precision of the FDM is affected by the perturbation step length. The calculation time of AVM is only about 0.5% of that of FDM. The conclusions of this study can provide a reference for topology optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3046662
Primary Topic
Topology Optimization in Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study on sensitivity analysis of transient vibration response in topology optimization

Hongliang Zhang, Hao Zheng, Hong‐Fu Wang, Qiang Zhou et al.
Topology Optimization in Engineering
article

Comparative study on sensitivity analysis of transient vibration response in topology optimization

Hongliang Zhang, Hao Zheng, Hong‐Fu Wang, Qiang Zhou, Haifeng Zhang, Ling Zhou, Wenyuan Yang, Yong Sun, Xianglei Bu
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates and summarizes the sensitivity analysis of transient vibration response in topological optimization problems. Firstly, the finite element calculation process of the transient vibration response based on the Newmark method is given. On this basis, the sensitivity formulae of the vibration response objective function to the element pseudo-density are derived using the finite difference method (FDM), the direct differential method (DDM), and the adjoint variable method (AVM). Numerical examples show that AVM has the same calculation accuracy as the DDM, while the precision of the FDM is affected by the perturbation step length. The calculation time of AVM is only about 0.5% of that of FDM. The conclusions of this study can provide a reference for topology optimization.

China South Industries Group (China) (CN), China Academy Of Machinery Science & Technology (China) (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Topology Optimization in Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.