Correlation between electrical resistivity and compressive strength of stabilized dredged sediment for early quality control

• Electrical resistivity used for early-stage quality control of stabilised sediments. • Resistivity could predict final compressive strength of treated dredged sediment. • Change in resistivity correlates with binder content after 24, 48 and 72 h of stabilisation. • Could be applied to rapid and cost-effective large-scale quality evaluation of sediments. Quality control of stabilized dredged sediment (DS) presents significant challenges due to its high-water content. Nowadays, many in-situ and laboratory tests have been used to evaluate the quality of treated DS, and the dominant method is 28-day unconfined compressive strength that can be done on undisturbed samples from the field and the laboratory. Due to the waiting period to get results from the tests and the destructive nature of tests, it is desirable to use a non-destructive method to control the quality of stabilized DS at an early stage. This study suggests electrical resistivity measurement as a non-destructive and fast method for evaluating the quality of stabilized DS. Dredged sediment samples from Göta älv, Gothenburg, with different water contents, were stabilized with different water-binder ratios at the laboratory. The quality of treated sediments was evaluated by uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) after 28-day of stabilizing, while strength development during the curing period was checked with a free-free resonance test at 7, 14, and 28 days of curing, and the electrical resistivity (ER) measurement monitored on some samples during the curing period. The results indicate that a combination of UCS tests and ER measurements can be utilized early stage evaluation of the quality of stabilized DS already after 24, 48 or 72 h. According to the results, after 24 h of hydration, the electrical resistivity was less than 1 Ωm. After 72 h of hydration, the resistivity was between 1 to 2.5 Ωm, which shows the development of strength. The 28-day strength varied from 0.25 MPa to 2 MPa while the resistivity varied between 3 Ωm to 22 Ωm. The observed variations in resistivity and compressive strength can be attributed to differences in the water-to-binder ratio across the samples. This approach offers a practical, non-destructive method for detecting early quality issues of stabilized DS, enabling quicker decision-making and potentially reducing project timelines and costs while maintaining the integrity and safety of construction projects involving stabilized dredged sediments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Engineering
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2024.100280
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geophysical Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlation between electrical resistivity and compressive strength of stabilized dredged sediment for early quality control

Mikael Lumetzberger, Per Hedblom, Torleif Dahlin, Mohammadhossein Gholampoor
1 citations
Transportation Engineering
Geophysical Methods and Applications
0.34
article

Correlation between electrical resistivity and compressive strength of stabilized dredged sediment for early quality control

Mikael Lumetzberger, Per Hedblom, Torleif Dahlin, Mohammadhossein Gholampoor
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Electrical resistivity used for early-stage quality control of stabilised sediments. • Resistivity could predict final compressive strength of treated dredged sediment. • Change in resistivity correlates with binder content after 24, 48 and 72 h of stabilisation. • Could be applied to rapid and cost-effective large-scale quality evaluation of sediments. Quality control of stabilized dredged sediment (DS) presents significant challenges due to its high-water content. Nowadays, many in-situ and laboratory tests have been used to evaluate the quality of treated DS, and the dominant method is 28-day unconfined compressive strength that can be done on undisturbed samples from the field and the laboratory. Due to the waiting period to get results from the tests and the destructive nature of tests, it is desirable to use a non-destructive method to control the quality of stabilized DS at an early stage. This study suggests electrical resistivity measurement as a non-destructive and fast method for evaluating the quality of stabilized DS. Dredged sediment samples from Göta älv, Gothenburg, with different water contents, were stabilized with different water-binder ratios at the laboratory. The quality of treated sediments was evaluated by uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) after 28-day of stabilizing, while strength development during the curing period was checked with a free-free resonance test at 7, 14, and 28 days of curing, and the electrical resistivity (ER) measurement monitored on some samples during the curing period. The results indicate that a combination of UCS tests and ER measurements can be utilized early stage evaluation of the quality of stabilized DS already after 24, 48 or 72 h. According to the results, after 24 h of hydration, the electrical resistivity was less than 1 Ωm. After 72 h of hydration, the resistivity was between 1 to 2.5 Ωm, which shows the development of strength. The 28-day strength varied from 0.25 MPa to 2 MPa while the resistivity varied between 3 Ωm to 22 Ωm. The observed variations in resistivity and compressive strength can be attributed to differences in the water-to-binder ratio across the samples. This approach offers a practical, non-destructive method for detecting early quality issues of stabilized DS, enabling quicker decision-making and potentially reducing project timelines and costs while maintaining the integrity and safety of construction projects involving stabilized dredged sediments.

Transportation EngineeringVol. 18
Lund University (SE), Älvdalens Fastbränsleteknik Aktiebolag (Sweden) (SE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Geophysical Methods and Applications
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.