A framework for human evaluation of large language models in healthcare derived from literature review

With generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models (LLMs), continuing to make inroads in healthcare, assessing LLMs with human evaluations is essential to assuring safety and effectiveness. This study reviews existing literature on human evaluation methodologies for LLMs in healthcare across various medical specialties and addresses factors such as evaluation dimensions, sample types and sizes, selection, and recruitment of evaluators, frameworks and metrics, evaluation process, and statistical analysis type. Our literature review of 142 studies shows gaps in reliability, generalizability, and applicability of current human evaluation practices. To overcome such significant obstacles to healthcare LLM developments and deployments, we propose QUEST, a comprehensive and practical framework for human evaluation of LLMs covering three phases of workflow: Planning, Implementation and Adjudication, and Scoring and Review. QUEST is designed with five proposed evaluation principles: Quality of Information, Understanding and Reasoning, Expression Style and Persona, Safety and Harm, and Trust and Confidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2024-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01258-7
Citations
219
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A framework for human evaluation of large language models in healthcare derived from literature review

Sunyang Fu, Cong Sun, Shyam Visweswaran, Piyush Mathur et al.
219 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
26.34
article

A framework for human evaluation of large language models in healthcare derived from literature review

Sunyang Fu, Cong Sun, Shyam Visweswaran, Piyush Mathur, Giovanni Cacciamani, Yanshan Wang, Yifan Peng, Sonish Sivarajkumar, Sumit Kapoor, Katelyn Polanska, Hunter Osterhoudt, Xizhi Wu, Alisa V Stolyar, Thomas Yu Chow Tam, Karleigh R McCarthy
article en
219 citations

Abstract

With generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models (LLMs), continuing to make inroads in healthcare, assessing LLMs with human evaluations is essential to assuring safety and effectiveness. This study reviews existing literature on human evaluation methodologies for LLMs in healthcare across various medical specialties and addresses factors such as evaluation dimensions, sample types and sizes, selection, and recruitment of evaluators, frameworks and metrics, evaluation process, and statistical analysis type. Our literature review of 142 studies shows gaps in reliability, generalizability, and applicability of current human evaluation practices. To overcome such significant obstacles to healthcare LLM developments and deployments, we propose QUEST, a comprehensive and practical framework for human evaluation of LLMs covering three phases of workflow: Planning, Implementation and Adjudication, and Scoring and Review. QUEST is designed with five proposed evaluation principles: Quality of Information, Understanding and Reasoning, Expression Style and Persona, Safety and Harm, and Trust and Confidence.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 7(1)
University of Southern California (US), Allen Institute for Brain Science (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Cornell University (US), UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
University of Pittsburgh, National Institutes of Health
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
26.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.