A multi-road user evaluation of the acceptance of connected and automated vehicles through the lenses of safety and justice

• Automated vehicles require inclusive analysis of justice and safety disparities. • We analyse the acceptance of CAV deployment for drivers and pedestrians. • Individual differences shape CAVs’ acceptability to adopt advanced automotive technologies. • Participants support CAVs but emphasise potential harm to vulnerable road users. • Economic barriers: Cost and benefits significant for CAVs’ acceptance. As technological development towards connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) continues to rise, addressing the challenges associated with their integration is crucial, especially regarding public acceptance. This study explores the acceptability of CAVs, focusing on their potential role in enhancing safety and justice within the transport system. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a diverse participant group, including 18 car drivers (aged 20–79, M = 48.3, SD = 18.77) and 12 pedestrians (aged 18–61, M = 36.0, SD = 12.94). Thematic analysis was employed to identify and contextualise factors influencing CAV acceptability, encompassing usefulness, ease of use, effectiveness, affordability, and social acceptability. Results emphasised safety as a top priority for both drivers and pedestrians. Trust and system reliability were also common concerns, varying with participants’ roles and transport experiences. Both drivers and pedestrians identified cost and economic benefits as significant barriers to CAV acceptance. Moreover, shared apprehensions about justice in adopting CAVs acknowledged the imperfections inherent in technological advancements. Participants supported CAVs but raised concerns about potential harm to vulnerable road users. Both car drivers and pedestrians expressed concerns that introducing CAVs could exacerbate existing injustices these road users face. This study offers valuable insights into how individual differences influence CAV acceptability, contributing to understanding their preparedness to adopt advanced automotive technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.011
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-road user evaluation of the acceptance of connected and automated vehicles through the lenses of safety and justice

Andry Rakotonirainy, Laura Martínez‐Buelvas, Óscar Oviedo-Trespalacios, Deanna Grant‐Smith
11 citations
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
7.08
article

A multi-road user evaluation of the acceptance of connected and automated vehicles through the lenses of safety and justice

Andry Rakotonirainy, Laura Martínez‐Buelvas, Óscar Oviedo-Trespalacios, Deanna Grant‐Smith
article en
11 citations

Abstract

• Automated vehicles require inclusive analysis of justice and safety disparities. • We analyse the acceptance of CAV deployment for drivers and pedestrians. • Individual differences shape CAVs’ acceptability to adopt advanced automotive technologies. • Participants support CAVs but emphasise potential harm to vulnerable road users. • Economic barriers: Cost and benefits significant for CAVs’ acceptance. As technological development towards connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) continues to rise, addressing the challenges associated with their integration is crucial, especially regarding public acceptance. This study explores the acceptability of CAVs, focusing on their potential role in enhancing safety and justice within the transport system. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a diverse participant group, including 18 car drivers (aged 20–79, M = 48.3, SD = 18.77) and 12 pedestrians (aged 18–61, M = 36.0, SD = 12.94). Thematic analysis was employed to identify and contextualise factors influencing CAV acceptability, encompassing usefulness, ease of use, effectiveness, affordability, and social acceptability. Results emphasised safety as a top priority for both drivers and pedestrians. Trust and system reliability were also common concerns, varying with participants’ roles and transport experiences. Both drivers and pedestrians identified cost and economic benefits as significant barriers to CAV acceptance. Moreover, shared apprehensions about justice in adopting CAVs acknowledged the imperfections inherent in technological advancements. Participants supported CAVs but raised concerns about potential harm to vulnerable road users. Both car drivers and pedestrians expressed concerns that introducing CAVs could exacerbate existing injustices these road users face. This study offers valuable insights into how individual differences influence CAV acceptability, contributing to understanding their preparedness to adopt advanced automotive technologies.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 107
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar (CO), Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
7.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.