Number: Still a primary visual feature

Some of the strongest evidence that number is a primary visual feature (like color or contrast) comes from experiments demonstrating visual adaptation to number (e.g., Burr & Ross, 2008), wherein staring at a large number of dots decreases numerosity estimates of subsequent probe displays. Recently, these findings have been challenged by a deflationary account on which these effects reflect spatiotopic attenuation to unchanging information (Yousif et al., 2023). Here, we conduct a crucial comparison of these accounts by testing number adaptation for arrays whose spatial properties constantly change. Centrally fixating observers viewed two large discs subtending 9° that independently and randomly translated on either side (left or right) of the display. During the adaptation phase, varying numbers of dots appeared and faded at changing locations within each continuously-moving disc. After 12 seconds, the dots disappeared and the discs continued moving for an additional 1000ms. Following this delay, a tone signaled the appearance of a new number of probe dots, appearing for 500ms in new locations within each disc; observers judged which disc contained more dots. On critical trials, probe dots were equal in number at the time of the tone. If number is a primary visual feature that can be bound to an object, then subjects should show an adaptation effect (thereby judging the disc previously containing the smaller adapter number as greater). If number adaptation effects are really spatiotopic attenuation to unchanging information, then subjects should not show an adaptation effect. Subjects showed the predicted adaptation effect. This result suggests that number adaptation persists despite drastic changes to spatiotopic and retinotopic position, contra an explanation in which adaptation results from filtering out information that remains unchanged between adapter and probe displays. Our findings re-open the case for genuine number adaptation and numerosity as a primary visual feature more broadly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1310
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Number: Still a primary visual feature

Chaz Firestone, Justin Halberda, Caroline Myers
2 citations
Journal of Vision
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
1.42
article

Number: Still a primary visual feature

Chaz Firestone, Justin Halberda, Caroline Myers
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Some of the strongest evidence that number is a primary visual feature (like color or contrast) comes from experiments demonstrating visual adaptation to number (e.g., Burr & Ross, 2008), wherein staring at a large number of dots decreases numerosity estimates of subsequent probe displays. Recently, these findings have been challenged by a deflationary account on which these effects reflect spatiotopic attenuation to unchanging information (Yousif et al., 2023). Here, we conduct a crucial comparison of these accounts by testing number adaptation for arrays whose spatial properties constantly change. Centrally fixating observers viewed two large discs subtending 9° that independently and randomly translated on either side (left or right) of the display. During the adaptation phase, varying numbers of dots appeared and faded at changing locations within each continuously-moving disc. After 12 seconds, the dots disappeared and the discs continued moving for an additional 1000ms. Following this delay, a tone signaled the appearance of a new number of probe dots, appearing for 500ms in new locations within each disc; observers judged which disc contained more dots. On critical trials, probe dots were equal in number at the time of the tone. If number is a primary visual feature that can be bound to an object, then subjects should show an adaptation effect (thereby judging the disc previously containing the smaller adapter number as greater). If number adaptation effects are really spatiotopic attenuation to unchanging information, then subjects should not show an adaptation effect. Subjects showed the predicted adaptation effect. This result suggests that number adaptation persists despite drastic changes to spatiotopic and retinotopic position, contra an explanation in which adaptation results from filtering out information that remains unchanged between adapter and probe displays. Our findings re-open the case for genuine number adaptation and numerosity as a primary visual feature more broadly.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.