Natural heading statistics over 42 hours of natural activity: Observations and implications for Bayesian modeling

Heading, the direction of linear self-motion in a head-centered reference frame, is estimated by the nervous system using vestibular and visual sensory cues. While accurate heading estimation is important for behaviors like locomotion (Cuturi and MacNeilage, 2013), human heading perception is biased, alternating between underestimation and overestimation of true stimulus values (Cuturi and MacNeilage, 2013; Crane, 2014). Perceptual biases can be modeled using Bayesian approaches that rely upon some representation of an organism’s previous experience, i.e., the prior distribution. The form of the prior can be constrained by measuring natural stimulus statistics, but to date there has been little work that has measured natural statistics of heading in humans. We therefore recorded head movements using a positional tracking camera (Hausamann et al., 2021) worn by ten participants over 50 hours of unconstrained, natural activity outside the lab. We use a kinematic calibration procedure detailed in previous work assessing human head orientation (Sinnott et al., 2023) to transform data out of sensor coordinates and into a head-centered reference frame. Positional tracking methods also allow for direct estimation of self-motion and heading direction. After pre-processing, we report data from approximately 42 hours of activity. Both heading azimuth (direction in the horizontal plane) and elevation (vertical plane) appear similar across participants, with means close to 0° (straight ahead); both azimuth and elevation exhibit high variability. To investigate this further we partitioned data into low (<0.75 m/s) and high (>0.75 m/s) speed epochs when participants predominantly performed stationary and locomotor tasks, respectively. While low-speed heading retains high variability, high-speed heading has decreased variability and high-speed heading azimuth appears Gaussian. We also present an early implementation of an efficient Bayesian model (Wei and Stocker, 2017) using our empirical measures of natural heading statistics to predict previously observed heading bias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1249
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Natural heading statistics over 42 hours of natural activity: Observations and implications for Bayesian modeling

Paul R. MacNeilage, Christian Sinnott
Journal of Vision
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

Natural heading statistics over 42 hours of natural activity: Observations and implications for Bayesian modeling

Paul R. MacNeilage, Christian Sinnott
article en

Abstract

Heading, the direction of linear self-motion in a head-centered reference frame, is estimated by the nervous system using vestibular and visual sensory cues. While accurate heading estimation is important for behaviors like locomotion (Cuturi and MacNeilage, 2013), human heading perception is biased, alternating between underestimation and overestimation of true stimulus values (Cuturi and MacNeilage, 2013; Crane, 2014). Perceptual biases can be modeled using Bayesian approaches that rely upon some representation of an organism’s previous experience, i.e., the prior distribution. The form of the prior can be constrained by measuring natural stimulus statistics, but to date there has been little work that has measured natural statistics of heading in humans. We therefore recorded head movements using a positional tracking camera (Hausamann et al., 2021) worn by ten participants over 50 hours of unconstrained, natural activity outside the lab. We use a kinematic calibration procedure detailed in previous work assessing human head orientation (Sinnott et al., 2023) to transform data out of sensor coordinates and into a head-centered reference frame. Positional tracking methods also allow for direct estimation of self-motion and heading direction. After pre-processing, we report data from approximately 42 hours of activity. Both heading azimuth (direction in the horizontal plane) and elevation (vertical plane) appear similar across participants, with means close to 0° (straight ahead); both azimuth and elevation exhibit high variability. To investigate this further we partitioned data into low (<0.75 m/s) and high (>0.75 m/s) speed epochs when participants predominantly performed stationary and locomotor tasks, respectively. While low-speed heading retains high variability, high-speed heading has decreased variability and high-speed heading azimuth appears Gaussian. We also present an early implementation of an efficient Bayesian model (Wei and Stocker, 2017) using our empirical measures of natural heading statistics to predict previously observed heading bias.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Nevada, Reno (US), Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.