The representational dynamics of visual expectations in the brain

Visual perception is modulated by expectations resulting from prior knowledge. Despite significant progress in recent decades, the neural mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain unclear. Notably, the features in which expectations of real-world objects are represented in the brain are largely unknown: Are expected objects represented as detailed images with both low- and high-level features or are they represented only in terms of some features? Which features play a part in the modulation of sensory processing once an object is seen? In this study, participants were shown cues followed by object images. There were 8 cues associated with 8 object images, with a 58% validity; these associations were not explicitly learned. Participants had to categorize objects as animate or inanimate while their brain activity was recorded using magnetoencephalography (MEG). We used representational similarity analysis and a convolutional neural network to assess the features in which expected and perceived objects were represented during the task. Perceived objects were first represented in low-level features on posterior sensors, and then in high-level features on anterior sensors. During that time, expected objects were represented in high-level features, on anterior sensors. Interestingly, a low-level representation of expected objects was observed during cue presentation prior to object onset (starting around 300 ms after cue onset). These results suggest that expected objects are represented both with low- and high-level features but that only high-level features play a role in the integration of expectations with sensory information. The fact that this high-level representation was only visible on anterior sensors, throughout all object processing, suggests that this integration happens in high-level brain areas. The precise loci of these phenomena will be further investigated using source-level analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1362
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The representational dynamics of visual expectations in the brain

Nicholas B. Turk‐Browne, Jose Cortes-Briones, Laurent Caplette, Tetsu Kurumisawa et al.
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

The representational dynamics of visual expectations in the brain

Nicholas B. Turk‐Browne, Jose Cortes-Briones, Laurent Caplette, Tetsu Kurumisawa, Helen Borges
article en

Abstract

Visual perception is modulated by expectations resulting from prior knowledge. Despite significant progress in recent decades, the neural mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain unclear. Notably, the features in which expectations of real-world objects are represented in the brain are largely unknown: Are expected objects represented as detailed images with both low- and high-level features or are they represented only in terms of some features? Which features play a part in the modulation of sensory processing once an object is seen? In this study, participants were shown cues followed by object images. There were 8 cues associated with 8 object images, with a 58% validity; these associations were not explicitly learned. Participants had to categorize objects as animate or inanimate while their brain activity was recorded using magnetoencephalography (MEG). We used representational similarity analysis and a convolutional neural network to assess the features in which expected and perceived objects were represented during the task. Perceived objects were first represented in low-level features on posterior sensors, and then in high-level features on anterior sensors. During that time, expected objects were represented in high-level features, on anterior sensors. Interestingly, a low-level representation of expected objects was observed during cue presentation prior to object onset (starting around 300 ms after cue onset). These results suggest that expected objects are represented both with low- and high-level features but that only high-level features play a role in the integration of expectations with sensory information. The fact that this high-level representation was only visible on anterior sensors, throughout all object processing, suggests that this integration happens in high-level brain areas. The precise loci of these phenomena will be further investigated using source-level analyses.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Yale University (US), VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US), Connecticut Mental Health Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.