Comparing artificial neural network models with varied objectives to probe the role of sensory representation in primate visual memorability

Imagine a typical experience of scrolling through numerous photos on social media. While most images blend into obscurity, certain ones, like a playful kitten tangled in yarn, linger in our memories. This selective retention, known as image memorability, raises intriguing questions about its neural basis, particularly how the sensory representations in the cortex facilitate this behavior. In this study, we investigate this process, leveraging recent strides in computer vision through artificial neural network (ANN) models. These models, designed to mimic the ventral visual pathway in primates, offer a vast hypotheses space for the brain function that are critical for determining the memorability of an image. We compare two distinct types of ANNs: models geared toward basic object categorization (e.g., ResNet-50, AlexNet, GoogLeNet) and those tailored to predict image memorability (e.g., MemNet, ViTMem) on a set of 200 images (20 images from 10 distinct object categories) from the MS-COCO dataset. Consistent with previous results, we observed that both these model classes can predict which images humans find most memorable. However, our results show that they produce significantly different internal representations as assessed by representational similarity analysis (comparing representations across model classes in architecture-specific and non-specific manner). In addition, here, we used neural data recorded across the macaque inferior temporal (IT) in 6 monkeys to address two primary questions. 1) Can both model classes accurately predict variance in the neural data? 2) Do they predict distinct variances in the responses of the individual neurons? Surprisingly, our results show that memorability models (MemNet) predict significantly more variance in the neural data than object categorization models with matched architecture (AlexNet) – emphasizing a) the need to further probe these model classes as encoding models of the ventral stream, b) provide a new normative framework to think about the evolution of sensory representations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1239
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing artificial neural network models with varied objectives to probe the role of sensory representation in primate visual memorability

Kohitij Kar, Ram Ahuja
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Comparing artificial neural network models with varied objectives to probe the role of sensory representation in primate visual memorability

Kohitij Kar, Ram Ahuja
article en

Abstract

Imagine a typical experience of scrolling through numerous photos on social media. While most images blend into obscurity, certain ones, like a playful kitten tangled in yarn, linger in our memories. This selective retention, known as image memorability, raises intriguing questions about its neural basis, particularly how the sensory representations in the cortex facilitate this behavior. In this study, we investigate this process, leveraging recent strides in computer vision through artificial neural network (ANN) models. These models, designed to mimic the ventral visual pathway in primates, offer a vast hypotheses space for the brain function that are critical for determining the memorability of an image. We compare two distinct types of ANNs: models geared toward basic object categorization (e.g., ResNet-50, AlexNet, GoogLeNet) and those tailored to predict image memorability (e.g., MemNet, ViTMem) on a set of 200 images (20 images from 10 distinct object categories) from the MS-COCO dataset. Consistent with previous results, we observed that both these model classes can predict which images humans find most memorable. However, our results show that they produce significantly different internal representations as assessed by representational similarity analysis (comparing representations across model classes in architecture-specific and non-specific manner). In addition, here, we used neural data recorded across the macaque inferior temporal (IT) in 6 monkeys to address two primary questions. 1) Can both model classes accurately predict variance in the neural data? 2) Do they predict distinct variances in the responses of the individual neurons? Surprisingly, our results show that memorability models (MemNet) predict significantly more variance in the neural data than object categorization models with matched architecture (AlexNet) – emphasizing a) the need to further probe these model classes as encoding models of the ventral stream, b) provide a new normative framework to think about the evolution of sensory representations.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
York University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.