The neural bases of fluctuations in shift readiness and sustained attention

The capacity to anticipate environmental demands and adjust spatial attention accordingly is a crucial aspect of attentional control. As an individual’s goals change, they must regulate their readiness to shift attention, such that the cost associated with shifting decreases as the likelihood of shifting increases (e.g., Sali et al., 2015). Moreover, the efficacy of sustained attention is subject to variability over time, with periods of high and low response time (RT) variability indicating unfocused and focused states, respectively (e.g., Esterman et al., 2013). In the current study, we measured the behavioral consequences and neural correlates of both forms of control fluctuations simultaneously. While inside an MRI scanner, participants completed a variant of the gradual continuous performance task (gradCPT) in which they detected frequent targets among distractors in one of two simultaneous visual streams, shifted or held attention in response to embedded visual cues, and made a digit categorization as a measure of shift readiness. We manipulated the shift likelihood across blocks of trials. As in previous studies, blocks with a high shift likelihood were associated with a reduction in response time shift costs relative to blocks with a low shift likelihood, reflecting learned shift readiness. We defined periods of high and low sustained attention efficacy, referred to as “in the zone” and “out of the zone,” respectively, based on ongoing changes in continuous performance task RT variability and found that commission errors were significantly more frequent when participants were “out of the zone” than when “in the zone.” Functional MRI analysis suggested that separate but interacting neural systems account for moment-by-moment changes in attentional control, with the frontoparietal cortex detecting and responding to violations of shift readiness and the default mode network regulating ongoing changes in sustained attention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1353
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The neural bases of fluctuations in shift readiness and sustained attention

Anna Toledo, Emily E Oor, Anthony W. Sali, Yuxin Xie
Journal of Vision
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
article

The neural bases of fluctuations in shift readiness and sustained attention

Anna Toledo, Emily E Oor, Anthony W. Sali, Yuxin Xie
article en

Abstract

The capacity to anticipate environmental demands and adjust spatial attention accordingly is a crucial aspect of attentional control. As an individual’s goals change, they must regulate their readiness to shift attention, such that the cost associated with shifting decreases as the likelihood of shifting increases (e.g., Sali et al., 2015). Moreover, the efficacy of sustained attention is subject to variability over time, with periods of high and low response time (RT) variability indicating unfocused and focused states, respectively (e.g., Esterman et al., 2013). In the current study, we measured the behavioral consequences and neural correlates of both forms of control fluctuations simultaneously. While inside an MRI scanner, participants completed a variant of the gradual continuous performance task (gradCPT) in which they detected frequent targets among distractors in one of two simultaneous visual streams, shifted or held attention in response to embedded visual cues, and made a digit categorization as a measure of shift readiness. We manipulated the shift likelihood across blocks of trials. As in previous studies, blocks with a high shift likelihood were associated with a reduction in response time shift costs relative to blocks with a low shift likelihood, reflecting learned shift readiness. We defined periods of high and low sustained attention efficacy, referred to as “in the zone” and “out of the zone,” respectively, based on ongoing changes in continuous performance task RT variability and found that commission errors were significantly more frequent when participants were “out of the zone” than when “in the zone.” Functional MRI analysis suggested that separate but interacting neural systems account for moment-by-moment changes in attentional control, with the frontoparietal cortex detecting and responding to violations of shift readiness and the default mode network regulating ongoing changes in sustained attention.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Georgetown University (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.