Modeling face-Identity “likeness” with a convolutional neural network trained for face identification

Certain face images are considered a better “likeness” of an identity than others. However, it remains unclear whether perceived likeness is driven by: a) the proximity of a face image to an averaged prototype comprising all instances of an identity (i.e., a “central prototype”), or b) how closely a face image approximates the most-common appearances of the identity (i.e., the “density” of known instances). Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained for face recognition can be used to instantiate face spaces that model both within- and between-identity variability. These networks provide a testbed for investigating human perceptions of face likeness. We compared human-assigned likeness ratings with likeness ratings based on identity-prototypes and local image density from a face-identification CNN. Participants (n=50) viewed 20 face images simultaneously (5 viewpoints x 4 illumination conditions) of each of 72 identities and adjusted a slider bar to indicate whether each image was a “good likeness” of the identity being shown. Responses were collapsed across participants to generate a single likeness rating per image. Next, we used face-image descriptors from a CNN to generate likeness ratings based on either the proximity of a descriptor from the “prototype” created by averaging all corresponding same-identity descriptors (prototype-proximity likeness) or the density of same-identity descriptors located around a given descriptor in the output space generated by the CNN (density likeness). For all measures of perceived likeness (human-assigned ratings, prototype-proximity and density), likeness differed across viewpoint (p < 0.0001) and illumination (p < 0.001). However, only the CNN density-based likeness ratings mirrored the pattern of human likeness ratings. These results demonstrate that density within an identity-specific face space is a better model of human-assigned perceived-likeness ratings than distance to an identity prototype. In addition, these results show that viewpoint and illumination influence perceived-likeness ratings for face images.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1292
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling face-Identity “likeness” with a convolutional neural network trained for face identification

Alice J. O’Toole, Connor J. Parde
Journal of Vision
Face recognition and analysis
article

Modeling face-Identity “likeness” with a convolutional neural network trained for face identification

Alice J. O’Toole, Connor J. Parde
article en

Abstract

Certain face images are considered a better “likeness” of an identity than others. However, it remains unclear whether perceived likeness is driven by: a) the proximity of a face image to an averaged prototype comprising all instances of an identity (i.e., a “central prototype”), or b) how closely a face image approximates the most-common appearances of the identity (i.e., the “density” of known instances). Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained for face recognition can be used to instantiate face spaces that model both within- and between-identity variability. These networks provide a testbed for investigating human perceptions of face likeness. We compared human-assigned likeness ratings with likeness ratings based on identity-prototypes and local image density from a face-identification CNN. Participants (n=50) viewed 20 face images simultaneously (5 viewpoints x 4 illumination conditions) of each of 72 identities and adjusted a slider bar to indicate whether each image was a “good likeness” of the identity being shown. Responses were collapsed across participants to generate a single likeness rating per image. Next, we used face-image descriptors from a CNN to generate likeness ratings based on either the proximity of a descriptor from the “prototype” created by averaging all corresponding same-identity descriptors (prototype-proximity likeness) or the density of same-identity descriptors located around a given descriptor in the output space generated by the CNN (density likeness). For all measures of perceived likeness (human-assigned ratings, prototype-proximity and density), likeness differed across viewpoint (p < 0.0001) and illumination (p < 0.001). However, only the CNN density-based likeness ratings mirrored the pattern of human likeness ratings. These results demonstrate that density within an identity-specific face space is a better model of human-assigned perceived-likeness ratings than distance to an identity prototype. In addition, these results show that viewpoint and illumination influence perceived-likeness ratings for face images.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
The University of Texas at Dallas (US), Vanderbilt University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Face recognition and analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.