Reversed Depth Illusion in Random-dot Stereograms Becomes More Visible When the Stereograms Are More Dynamic in Both Central and Peripheral Vision

In anticorrelated random-dot stereograms (RDSs), a black dot in one eye corresponds to a white dot in the other eye to depict visual depth of object surfaces. Neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) respond as if the depth order between surfaces is reversed from that defined by binocular disparities (Cummings & Parker 1997). The resulting reversed depth illusion is visible in peripheral but not in central vision (Zhaoping & Ackermann 2018). A Central-peripheral Dichotomy (CPD) theory explains this lack of central illusion as follows. Feedback from higher to lower visual areas to aid recognition mainly targets the central, rather than peripheral, visual fields. Such feedback verifies feedforward sensory signals, and thereby vetoes misleading V1 signals that cause the illusion. However, this illusion becomes visible in central vision using dynamic RDSs in which the random set of dots was replaced every 10 milliseconds by another randomly generated set while keeping the scene and stimulus design unchanged (Zhaoping ECVP 2021). The subsequent dots backward mask the previous dots, thereby compromising the feedback process that normally vetoes the illusion. In this study, we test whether this illusion also becomes more likely perceived in peripheral vision (at about 10 degrees eccentricity in the lower visual field) when the RDSs are made dynamic, and examine whether this illusion is more visible when the RDS becomes more dynamic, i.e., when the duration (e.g., 10 or 20 milliseconds) of each random set of dots becomes shorter. We report that, while this illusion remains more visible in peripheral vision, this visibility is enhanced in both central and peripheral vision when the RDSs are more dynamic. These findings suggest that the feedback verification is also present, albeit weaker, in peripheral vision. Whether backward masking enhances the reversed depth illusion more in central than peripheral vision will be reported.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1466
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reversed Depth Illusion in Random-dot Stereograms Becomes More Visible When the Stereograms Are More Dynamic in Both Central and Peripheral Vision

Li Zhaoping
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Reversed Depth Illusion in Random-dot Stereograms Becomes More Visible When the Stereograms Are More Dynamic in Both Central and Peripheral Vision

Li Zhaoping
article en

Abstract

In anticorrelated random-dot stereograms (RDSs), a black dot in one eye corresponds to a white dot in the other eye to depict visual depth of object surfaces. Neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) respond as if the depth order between surfaces is reversed from that defined by binocular disparities (Cummings & Parker 1997). The resulting reversed depth illusion is visible in peripheral but not in central vision (Zhaoping & Ackermann 2018). A Central-peripheral Dichotomy (CPD) theory explains this lack of central illusion as follows. Feedback from higher to lower visual areas to aid recognition mainly targets the central, rather than peripheral, visual fields. Such feedback verifies feedforward sensory signals, and thereby vetoes misleading V1 signals that cause the illusion. However, this illusion becomes visible in central vision using dynamic RDSs in which the random set of dots was replaced every 10 milliseconds by another randomly generated set while keeping the scene and stimulus design unchanged (Zhaoping ECVP 2021). The subsequent dots backward mask the previous dots, thereby compromising the feedback process that normally vetoes the illusion. In this study, we test whether this illusion also becomes more likely perceived in peripheral vision (at about 10 degrees eccentricity in the lower visual field) when the RDSs are made dynamic, and examine whether this illusion is more visible when the RDS becomes more dynamic, i.e., when the duration (e.g., 10 or 20 milliseconds) of each random set of dots becomes shorter. We report that, while this illusion remains more visible in peripheral vision, this visibility is enhanced in both central and peripheral vision when the RDSs are more dynamic. These findings suggest that the feedback verification is also present, albeit weaker, in peripheral vision. Whether backward masking enhances the reversed depth illusion more in central than peripheral vision will be reported.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reversed Depth Illusion in Random-dot Stereograms Becomes More Visible When the Stereograms Are More Dynamic in Both Central and Peripheral Vision — Li Zhaoping · Journal of Vision (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS