Towards determining the location of the Preferred Retinal Locus of patients with macular disease: A deep learning-based simulation

In the absence of a healthy fovea, individuals with macular disease often rely on an alternate retinal location, the preferred retinal locus (PRL), for seeing. However, the factors determining the PRL location are still unclear. Previous studies have reported that the PRL location is not driven by exclusively optimizing visual acuity (Bernard & Chung, 2018) or sensitivity (Chung et al., 2023). This study tests the feasibility of applying the semantic segmentation approach to predict the PRL location based on the eccentricity effect and how visual acuity and sensitivity vary across the retina. We first generated 200 scotoma patterns based on the actual scotoma shape and size of 21 eyes with macular disease (by sampling along each of 360° meridians the location of the edge of each generated scotoma). We then placed each scotoma pattern on the retinal images of 79 healthy eyes to generate 15,800 images. Each sample of our simulated data was a 3-channel vector (256×256). The first channel consisted of the image in grayscale pixel values. The second and third channels consisted of visual acuity and sensitivity values, respectively, generated based on values reported in the literature. For training purposes (using a DeepLabV3 network with 13,000 samples), we defined the PRL region of each vector by imposing certain constraints: it is close to the edge of the scotoma (Chung, 2012); its acuity and sensitivity values are near expected thresholds; and it is located closest to the fovea after satisfying the preceding constraints. Testing with the other 2800 samples showed that between the predicted and “true” PRLs, the mean Jaccard index (percent-overlap of area) was 53.7%±25.7%, and the mean Euclidean distance between their centers was 8.6±22.6 pixels. Our results suggest that a model combining eccentricity and visual performance variation across the retina is feasible in predicting the PRL location.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1300
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards determining the location of the Preferred Retinal Locus of patients with macular disease: A deep learning-based simulation

Rijul Saurabh Soans, Dongcheng He, Susana T. L. Chung
Journal of Vision
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Towards determining the location of the Preferred Retinal Locus of patients with macular disease: A deep learning-based simulation

Rijul Saurabh Soans, Dongcheng He, Susana T. L. Chung
article en

Abstract

In the absence of a healthy fovea, individuals with macular disease often rely on an alternate retinal location, the preferred retinal locus (PRL), for seeing. However, the factors determining the PRL location are still unclear. Previous studies have reported that the PRL location is not driven by exclusively optimizing visual acuity (Bernard & Chung, 2018) or sensitivity (Chung et al., 2023). This study tests the feasibility of applying the semantic segmentation approach to predict the PRL location based on the eccentricity effect and how visual acuity and sensitivity vary across the retina. We first generated 200 scotoma patterns based on the actual scotoma shape and size of 21 eyes with macular disease (by sampling along each of 360° meridians the location of the edge of each generated scotoma). We then placed each scotoma pattern on the retinal images of 79 healthy eyes to generate 15,800 images. Each sample of our simulated data was a 3-channel vector (256×256). The first channel consisted of the image in grayscale pixel values. The second and third channels consisted of visual acuity and sensitivity values, respectively, generated based on values reported in the literature. For training purposes (using a DeepLabV3 network with 13,000 samples), we defined the PRL region of each vector by imposing certain constraints: it is close to the edge of the scotoma (Chung, 2012); its acuity and sensitivity values are near expected thresholds; and it is located closest to the fovea after satisfying the preceding constraints. Testing with the other 2800 samples showed that between the predicted and “true” PRLs, the mean Jaccard index (percent-overlap of area) was 53.7%±25.7%, and the mean Euclidean distance between their centers was 8.6±22.6 pixels. Our results suggest that a model combining eccentricity and visual performance variation across the retina is feasible in predicting the PRL location.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards determining the location of the Preferred Retinal Locus of patients with macular disease: A deep learning-based simulation — Rijul Saurabh Soans, Dongcheng He, et al. · Journal of Vision (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS