Do People Pick Up Variables that Reflect Object Height Relative to Actor Height When Perceiving Others’ Maximum Vertical One Degree-of-Freedom Reach Heights?

Jones et al. (2023) investigated what variable(s) people pick up when perceiving others’ maximum vertical one degree-of-freedom reach heights. Their results suggest participants may have picked up variables that reflect object height relative to actors’ top of head heights when actors’ upper bodies were visible, and object height relative to actors’ leg lengths when only actors’ lower bodies were visible. Leg length is highly correlated with overall height. Accordingly, Jones et al. argued participants may have picked up variables that reflect object height relative to actor height in both cases. The present research evaluated Jones et al.’s explanation. In two experiments, participants viewed point-light displays depicting an actor and object. In Experiment 1, actors were depicted with short or tall necks and markers placed on their full or upper bodies. In Experiment 2, actors were depicted with short or tall legs and markers placed on their full or lower bodies. These manipulations changed object height in relation to actors’ top of head heights (Experiment 1) and object height in relation to actors’ leg lengths (Experiment 2) but did not change the actors’ maximum vertical one degree-of-freedom reach heights. Participants adjusted the object’s height to what they perceived to be the actor’s maximum vertical one degree-of-freedom reach height. In Experiment 1, judgments for the short-necked actors were lower than judgments for the tall-necked actors. In Experiment 2, judgments for the short-legged actors were lower than judgments for the tall-legged actors in the Lower Body condition, but not in the Full Body condition. These results support Jones et al.’s explanation. Further, they move us closer to identifying candidate variables that people pick up when perceiving actors’ maximum vertical one degree-of-freedom reach heights and enhance our understanding about how people perceive others’ affordances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1308
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do People Pick Up Variables that Reflect Object Height Relative to Actor Height When Perceiving Others’ Maximum Vertical One Degree-of-Freedom Reach Heights?

Nicholas A. Garcia, Keith S. Jones
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Do People Pick Up Variables that Reflect Object Height Relative to Actor Height When Perceiving Others’ Maximum Vertical One Degree-of-Freedom Reach Heights?

Nicholas A. Garcia, Keith S. Jones
article en

Abstract

Jones et al. (2023) investigated what variable(s) people pick up when perceiving others’ maximum vertical one degree-of-freedom reach heights. Their results suggest participants may have picked up variables that reflect object height relative to actors’ top of head heights when actors’ upper bodies were visible, and object height relative to actors’ leg lengths when only actors’ lower bodies were visible. Leg length is highly correlated with overall height. Accordingly, Jones et al. argued participants may have picked up variables that reflect object height relative to actor height in both cases. The present research evaluated Jones et al.’s explanation. In two experiments, participants viewed point-light displays depicting an actor and object. In Experiment 1, actors were depicted with short or tall necks and markers placed on their full or upper bodies. In Experiment 2, actors were depicted with short or tall legs and markers placed on their full or lower bodies. These manipulations changed object height in relation to actors’ top of head heights (Experiment 1) and object height in relation to actors’ leg lengths (Experiment 2) but did not change the actors’ maximum vertical one degree-of-freedom reach heights. Participants adjusted the object’s height to what they perceived to be the actor’s maximum vertical one degree-of-freedom reach height. In Experiment 1, judgments for the short-necked actors were lower than judgments for the tall-necked actors. In Experiment 2, judgments for the short-legged actors were lower than judgments for the tall-legged actors in the Lower Body condition, but not in the Full Body condition. These results support Jones et al.’s explanation. Further, they move us closer to identifying candidate variables that people pick up when perceiving actors’ maximum vertical one degree-of-freedom reach heights and enhance our understanding about how people perceive others’ affordances.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Texas Tech University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.