Visual perceptual learning completely transfers to a new location when phase, instead of contrast, is varied during training

Performance on visual tasks can be improved via training or experience, and this is called visual perceptual learning (VPL). However, this improved performance is limited to the trained task’s specifics, i.e. when the spatial position of the stimulus is changed, the improvement disappears. Yet, recent research shows that variability along task-irrelevant stimulus dimensions can alter this characteristic. We argue that variability determines which neurons undergo plasticity in VPL, and depending on these neurons’ invariance properties, generalization or specificity is achieved. We trained two groups of participants with almost identical tasks, only changing which task-irrelevant dimension varied between trials. In particular, we created variability by randomizing spatial phase in one training group and contrast in the other. After training, we tested for transfer to a new spatial location in both groups. Phase-invariant neurons emerge later in the visual processing hierarchy, compared to contrast-invariant neurons (e.g., complex, and simple cells), and hence phase-invariant neurons have larger spatial receptive fields. Due to this, we hypothesized that varying the phase of the training stimuli over trials would give rise to generalization in space due to neurons which are phase invariant taking a role in the training. On the other hand, as contrast-invariant neurons appear earlier in the hierarchy, we expected the learning to be more specific when participants were trained with varying contrast. We found that the randomizing phase of the training stimulus resulted in complete generalization of the improvement to a new spatial location, contrary to randomizing contrast. Our results show that which neural populations undergo plasticity with VPL is determined by the training task demands, and in turn, this affects generalization and specificity of behavioral improvements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1309
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual perceptual learning completely transfers to a new location when phase, instead of contrast, is varied during training

Caspar M. Schwiedrzik, Beyza Akkoyunlu
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Visual perceptual learning completely transfers to a new location when phase, instead of contrast, is varied during training

Caspar M. Schwiedrzik, Beyza Akkoyunlu
article en

Abstract

Performance on visual tasks can be improved via training or experience, and this is called visual perceptual learning (VPL). However, this improved performance is limited to the trained task’s specifics, i.e. when the spatial position of the stimulus is changed, the improvement disappears. Yet, recent research shows that variability along task-irrelevant stimulus dimensions can alter this characteristic. We argue that variability determines which neurons undergo plasticity in VPL, and depending on these neurons’ invariance properties, generalization or specificity is achieved. We trained two groups of participants with almost identical tasks, only changing which task-irrelevant dimension varied between trials. In particular, we created variability by randomizing spatial phase in one training group and contrast in the other. After training, we tested for transfer to a new spatial location in both groups. Phase-invariant neurons emerge later in the visual processing hierarchy, compared to contrast-invariant neurons (e.g., complex, and simple cells), and hence phase-invariant neurons have larger spatial receptive fields. Due to this, we hypothesized that varying the phase of the training stimuli over trials would give rise to generalization in space due to neurons which are phase invariant taking a role in the training. On the other hand, as contrast-invariant neurons appear earlier in the hierarchy, we expected the learning to be more specific when participants were trained with varying contrast. We found that the randomizing phase of the training stimulus resulted in complete generalization of the improvement to a new spatial location, contrary to randomizing contrast. Our results show that which neural populations undergo plasticity with VPL is determined by the training task demands, and in turn, this affects generalization and specificity of behavioral improvements.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Max Planck Society (DE), German Primate Center (DE), Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), European Neuroscience Institute Göttingen (DE), Leibniz ScienceCampus Primate Cognition (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.