In blindness, PPA-like responses to scene sounds are driven by stronger deactivation for human vocalizations, not activation for scenes

A prominent view is that the parahippocampal place area (PPA) preserves a role in scene perception, regardless of visual experience. This claim is based on findings that in congenitally blind people the medial vOTC (i.e., PPA) responds more to scene sounds (e.g., waves on a beach) than to human vocalizations (e.g., laughter, crying) - so called ‘face sounds’ (e.g., van den Hurk et al., 2017, PNAS). We tested whether in blindness the PPA: 1) responds to place sounds or deactivates to vocalizations, 2) whether the same vertices respond to scene sounds and tactile scenes and 3) whether there is specialization across left/right and anterior/posterior PPA. Fifteen English-speaking, congenitally blind adults performed a 1-back auditory task during fMRI. Conditions were scene sounds (e.g., waves crashing on a beach, city traffic; van den Hurk et al., 2017), non-verbal vocal sounds (e.g., laughter), language (English sentences), and foreign speech (Russian, Korean, Mandarin). The same participants also performed a tactile 1-back task, touching 3D-printed models of scenes and faces (Ratan Murty et al., 2020, PNAS). We replicate the previous finding of greater response to scene sounds than non-verbal vocalizations in medial vOTC. However, this effect is driven by greater deactivation to vocalizations, while responses to scene sounds are below (left PPA) or not different (right PPA) from rest. There is no evidence for anterior/posterior specialization. Responses to tactile scenes in the PPA were either below (left) or barely above rest (right) and no different than in lateral vOTC, where the fusiform face area is typically located. Rather, medial vOTC is distinguished from lateral vOTC by its deactivation to vocalizations. Results are not consistent with a role of medial vOTC for perception of places in blindness. We find no evidence that this region preserves its function for scene perception in the absence of visual experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1371
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In blindness, PPA-like responses to scene sounds are driven by stronger deactivation for human vocalizations, not activation for scenes

Elizabeth J. Saccone, Akshi LNU, Marina Bedny
Journal of Vision
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
article

In blindness, PPA-like responses to scene sounds are driven by stronger deactivation for human vocalizations, not activation for scenes

Elizabeth J. Saccone, Akshi LNU, Marina Bedny
article en

Abstract

A prominent view is that the parahippocampal place area (PPA) preserves a role in scene perception, regardless of visual experience. This claim is based on findings that in congenitally blind people the medial vOTC (i.e., PPA) responds more to scene sounds (e.g., waves on a beach) than to human vocalizations (e.g., laughter, crying) - so called ‘face sounds’ (e.g., van den Hurk et al., 2017, PNAS). We tested whether in blindness the PPA: 1) responds to place sounds or deactivates to vocalizations, 2) whether the same vertices respond to scene sounds and tactile scenes and 3) whether there is specialization across left/right and anterior/posterior PPA. Fifteen English-speaking, congenitally blind adults performed a 1-back auditory task during fMRI. Conditions were scene sounds (e.g., waves crashing on a beach, city traffic; van den Hurk et al., 2017), non-verbal vocal sounds (e.g., laughter), language (English sentences), and foreign speech (Russian, Korean, Mandarin). The same participants also performed a tactile 1-back task, touching 3D-printed models of scenes and faces (Ratan Murty et al., 2020, PNAS). We replicate the previous finding of greater response to scene sounds than non-verbal vocalizations in medial vOTC. However, this effect is driven by greater deactivation to vocalizations, while responses to scene sounds are below (left PPA) or not different (right PPA) from rest. There is no evidence for anterior/posterior specialization. Responses to tactile scenes in the PPA were either below (left) or barely above rest (right) and no different than in lateral vOTC, where the fusiform face area is typically located. Rather, medial vOTC is distinguished from lateral vOTC by its deactivation to vocalizations. Results are not consistent with a role of medial vOTC for perception of places in blindness. We find no evidence that this region preserves its function for scene perception in the absence of visual experience.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

In blindness, PPA-like responses to scene sounds are driven by stronger deactivation for human vocalizations, not activation for scenes — Elizabeth J. Saccone, Akshi LNU, et al. · Journal of Vision (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS