Decoding sound content in early visual cortex of aphantasic individuals

The retinotopic visual cortex of blindfolded and congenitally blind participants responds with decodable activity patterns to the sound of natural scenes (Vetter et al., 2014, 2020). Decoding accuracies increase from foveal to far peripheral retinotopic regions in V1 and V2, with stronger effects in the blind (V1, V2 & V3). There are direct projections from the auditory cortex to the peripheral visual cortex in non-human primates (Falchier et al., 2002) and we assume that in humans these projections are also more predominant in the periphery. In congenitally blind participants, visual feedforward processing is absent and top-down projections to the visual cortex might proliferate. In contrast, in aphantasia top-down projections might be less effective, leading to a loss of visual imagery experience. How about other forms of top-down projections? Is auditory top-down influence reduced in aphantasia? We presented auditory stimuli to 22 blindfolded aphantasic participants. We found that sound could only be decoded in foveal V3, reporting reduced decoding in V1 and V2 in aphantasics compared to controls and blind participants. When fitting a linear mixed effect model on data from the control, blind and aphantasic groups, we found a significant interaction effect between group and eccentricity and between area and eccentricity: in V1, the relative increase of decoding with eccentricity was strong only in the blind participants. The differences between groups increased in V2 and V3, with the largest differences being reported in V3, where decoding increased by eccentricity for the blind, did not change for controls, and decreased for aphantasic participants. Contrary to the enhanced feedback observed in blind participants, our findings suggest that the feedback of auditory content to the early visual cortex may be reduced in aphantasic participants. Reduced top-down projections might lead to both less decoding of sounds and reduced subjective experience of visual imagery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1347
Primary Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding sound content in early visual cortex of aphantasic individuals

Johanna Bergmann, Clément Abbatecola, Angus Paton, Petra Vetter et al.
Journal of Vision
Multisensory perception and integration
article

Decoding sound content in early visual cortex of aphantasic individuals

Johanna Bergmann, Clément Abbatecola, Angus Paton, Petra Vetter, Lucy S. Petro, Belén María Montabes de la Cruz, Roberto S. Luciani
article en

Abstract

The retinotopic visual cortex of blindfolded and congenitally blind participants responds with decodable activity patterns to the sound of natural scenes (Vetter et al., 2014, 2020). Decoding accuracies increase from foveal to far peripheral retinotopic regions in V1 and V2, with stronger effects in the blind (V1, V2 & V3). There are direct projections from the auditory cortex to the peripheral visual cortex in non-human primates (Falchier et al., 2002) and we assume that in humans these projections are also more predominant in the periphery. In congenitally blind participants, visual feedforward processing is absent and top-down projections to the visual cortex might proliferate. In contrast, in aphantasia top-down projections might be less effective, leading to a loss of visual imagery experience. How about other forms of top-down projections? Is auditory top-down influence reduced in aphantasia? We presented auditory stimuli to 22 blindfolded aphantasic participants. We found that sound could only be decoded in foveal V3, reporting reduced decoding in V1 and V2 in aphantasics compared to controls and blind participants. When fitting a linear mixed effect model on data from the control, blind and aphantasic groups, we found a significant interaction effect between group and eccentricity and between area and eccentricity: in V1, the relative increase of decoding with eccentricity was strong only in the blind participants. The differences between groups increased in V2 and V3, with the largest differences being reported in V3, where decoding increased by eccentricity for the blind, did not change for controls, and decreased for aphantasic participants. Contrary to the enhanced feedback observed in blind participants, our findings suggest that the feedback of auditory content to the early visual cortex may be reduced in aphantasic participants. Reduced top-down projections might lead to both less decoding of sounds and reduced subjective experience of visual imagery.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Fribourg (CH), Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE), Cognitive Neuroimaging Lab (FR), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Multisensory perception and integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.