Fast-tracking improvements of metacognitive assessments of visual working memory

Not only is visual working memory (VWM) limited in capacity, some VWM representations may be maintained inaccurately even though we feel confident about them. Given that such confident errors can cause severe costs (e.g., traffic accidents), we tested a new approach to improve observers’ insights into the accuracy of their representations. Previously, we successfully reduced confident errors through a 1.5-hour-long VWM training during which participants received performance feedback based on the accuracy of metacognitive assessment of their VWM representations. Participants remembered a briefly presented array of six colored squares, then reported each item with their confidence in the accuracy of their report. Critically, they received 10, 5, or 0 points for an accurate VWM report coupled with high, low, or no confidence, respectively. Conversely, they lost 10, 5, or 0 points for inaccurate responses coupled with high, low, or no confidence. This training reduced the occurrence of confident errors (i.e., errors coupled with high confidence). Interestingly, training benefits emerged in the first several minutes of training. Thus, in the current study, we tested whether shorter training (10 mins) was sufficient to produce a training benefit that also generalizes across different stimulus types. Specifically, participants (n = 78) performed two VWM tasks (10 mins each) where they remembered an array of six colored squares or oriented bars and reported each item with their confidence (high, low, or no confidence). After measuring baseline performance, participants repeated the color or orientation VWM task with feedback. Participants then repeated the two VWM tasks without feedback to assess the training benefit and its stimulus generalizability. Here, despite a shorter training session, participants reduced confident errors during and after training relative to baseline. This benefit also generalized to the untrained stimulus. Taken together, our results demonstrate rapid and stimulus-general improvement of metacognitive assessment of VWM representations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1317
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fast-tracking improvements of metacognitive assessments of visual working memory

Caitlin J. I. Tozios, Susanne Ferber, Hana Yabuki, Keisuke Fukuda
Journal of Vision
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

Fast-tracking improvements of metacognitive assessments of visual working memory

Caitlin J. I. Tozios, Susanne Ferber, Hana Yabuki, Keisuke Fukuda
article en

Abstract

Not only is visual working memory (VWM) limited in capacity, some VWM representations may be maintained inaccurately even though we feel confident about them. Given that such confident errors can cause severe costs (e.g., traffic accidents), we tested a new approach to improve observers’ insights into the accuracy of their representations. Previously, we successfully reduced confident errors through a 1.5-hour-long VWM training during which participants received performance feedback based on the accuracy of metacognitive assessment of their VWM representations. Participants remembered a briefly presented array of six colored squares, then reported each item with their confidence in the accuracy of their report. Critically, they received 10, 5, or 0 points for an accurate VWM report coupled with high, low, or no confidence, respectively. Conversely, they lost 10, 5, or 0 points for inaccurate responses coupled with high, low, or no confidence. This training reduced the occurrence of confident errors (i.e., errors coupled with high confidence). Interestingly, training benefits emerged in the first several minutes of training. Thus, in the current study, we tested whether shorter training (10 mins) was sufficient to produce a training benefit that also generalizes across different stimulus types. Specifically, participants (n = 78) performed two VWM tasks (10 mins each) where they remembered an array of six colored squares or oriented bars and reported each item with their confidence (high, low, or no confidence). After measuring baseline performance, participants repeated the color or orientation VWM task with feedback. Participants then repeated the two VWM tasks without feedback to assess the training benefit and its stimulus generalizability. Here, despite a shorter training session, participants reduced confident errors during and after training relative to baseline. This benefit also generalized to the untrained stimulus. Taken together, our results demonstrate rapid and stimulus-general improvement of metacognitive assessment of VWM representations.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Toronto (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.