The Effect of Fixation Location on Face Perception in Younger and Older Adults

Information of different facial features is distributed in various facial regions. For instance, the eye region, compared to other areas, is particularly informative for identity perception. However, not all observer focus on the eye region for this purpose. There are inter-individual differences in the region in which younger individuals fixate for identity perception: some preferred the eyes, the nose for the others. Fixation patterns also differ between age groups: older adults have more fixations on the lower half of the face compared to younger adults. However, when fixation is restricted to specific regions, younger adults demonstrated the best identity perception when fixation was restricted to the eye. Where do younger and older adults look on faces, and can they show improved performance in recognizing faces when focusing on specific facial regions? The first objective of this study is to describe and compare the optimal fixation locations of younger and older observers. The second objective is to investigate how restricting fixation location interacts with age on face perception. Each trial started with the presentation of a fixation square, followed by the target face, and a face selection task. The off-face condition began with a fixation square outside the face’s anticipated display area. The on-face condition started with a fixation square on the forehead, eye, nose, or mouth. Preliminary analysis showed age-related in both conditions (20 younger and 20 older adults). Restricting the fixation location seems to reduce these age-related differences, with older adults showing improved performance, particularly at the eye and nose locations. Notably, an age-related difference emerged at the nose location, where older adults benefited more from nose restriction fixation than younger adults. Both younger and older adults showed greater performance in face perception when the initial fixation was directed to the eye and the nose region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.911
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Fixation Location on Face Perception in Younger and Older Adults

A. Sekuler, Björn Herrmann, Eric Cui, Matthew Clark et al.
Journal of Vision
Face recognition and analysis
article

The Effect of Fixation Location on Face Perception in Younger and Older Adults

A. Sekuler, Björn Herrmann, Eric Cui, Matthew Clark, Farhan Abdul Vaheed
article en

Abstract

Information of different facial features is distributed in various facial regions. For instance, the eye region, compared to other areas, is particularly informative for identity perception. However, not all observer focus on the eye region for this purpose. There are inter-individual differences in the region in which younger individuals fixate for identity perception: some preferred the eyes, the nose for the others. Fixation patterns also differ between age groups: older adults have more fixations on the lower half of the face compared to younger adults. However, when fixation is restricted to specific regions, younger adults demonstrated the best identity perception when fixation was restricted to the eye. Where do younger and older adults look on faces, and can they show improved performance in recognizing faces when focusing on specific facial regions? The first objective of this study is to describe and compare the optimal fixation locations of younger and older observers. The second objective is to investigate how restricting fixation location interacts with age on face perception. Each trial started with the presentation of a fixation square, followed by the target face, and a face selection task. The off-face condition began with a fixation square outside the face’s anticipated display area. The on-face condition started with a fixation square on the forehead, eye, nose, or mouth. Preliminary analysis showed age-related in both conditions (20 younger and 20 older adults). Restricting the fixation location seems to reduce these age-related differences, with older adults showing improved performance, particularly at the eye and nose locations. Notably, an age-related difference emerged at the nose location, where older adults benefited more from nose restriction fixation than younger adults. Both younger and older adults showed greater performance in face perception when the initial fixation was directed to the eye and the nose region.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Toronto (CA), Baycrest Hospital (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Face recognition and analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.