The mechanisms of crossed and uncrossed disparities in coarse stereopsis

Stereopsis, our ability to perceive depth, is a fundamental aspect of vision. It allows us to judge whether objects are “in front of” or “behind” each other. High variability in the perception of stereopsis has been reported in the population. Previous studies suggest that this variability may results from different mechanisms subserving the perception of crossed and uncrossed stereopsis. In our previous study, we focused on fine stereopsis. Here we focused on coarse stereopsis. We investigated the difference between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis mechanisms using an identification-at-threshold paradigm. We used a 2-by-2 forced choice procedure where participants had to both report the interval with the stimulus and judge whether the stimulus was crossed or uncrossed. The stimulus consisted of a gaussian bump (size) in a filtered noise texture (0.7 cycles per degree). Preliminary data revealed that typical observers were able to consistently achieve perfect discrimination. However, at extremely large disparities, some individuals could not discern polarity, probably because they could not fuse anymore. As observed before for fine stereopsis, these results suggest that crossed and uncrossed disparities are mediated by 2 different channels for coarse stereopsis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1366
Primary Topic
Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The mechanisms of crossed and uncrossed disparities in coarse stereopsis

Penghan Wang, Alexandre Reynaud, Robert F. Hess
Journal of Vision
Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
article

The mechanisms of crossed and uncrossed disparities in coarse stereopsis

Penghan Wang, Alexandre Reynaud, Robert F. Hess
article en

Abstract

Stereopsis, our ability to perceive depth, is a fundamental aspect of vision. It allows us to judge whether objects are “in front of” or “behind” each other. High variability in the perception of stereopsis has been reported in the population. Previous studies suggest that this variability may results from different mechanisms subserving the perception of crossed and uncrossed stereopsis. In our previous study, we focused on fine stereopsis. Here we focused on coarse stereopsis. We investigated the difference between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis mechanisms using an identification-at-threshold paradigm. We used a 2-by-2 forced choice procedure where participants had to both report the interval with the stimulus and judge whether the stimulus was crossed or uncrossed. The stimulus consisted of a gaussian bump (size) in a filtered noise texture (0.7 cycles per degree). Preliminary data revealed that typical observers were able to consistently achieve perfect discrimination. However, at extremely large disparities, some individuals could not discern polarity, probably because they could not fuse anymore. As observed before for fine stereopsis, these results suggest that crossed and uncrossed disparities are mediated by 2 different channels for coarse stereopsis.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
McGill University (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The mechanisms of crossed and uncrossed disparities in coarse stereopsis — Penghan Wang, Alexandre Reynaud, et al. · Journal of Vision (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS