How inflexible is the attentional bias towards recently selected locations?

Attention is strongly biased towards the location where a previous target was recently found. This priming-of-location (PoL) effect is thought to reflect a primitive mechanism by which selecting an object automatically and proactively enhances the attentional priority at its location. This account predicts that PoL should be unaffected by changes in task context. However, in most previous PoL studies the task context remained constant. Here, we tested this prediction using a probe paradigm. We manipulated task context by interleaving search trials where participants searched for a shape target among nontargets (2/3 of trials), search-probe trials where they reported letters briefly superimposed on the search display after a short delay (1/6), and probe trials where only the letters appeared (1/6). In Experiments 1 and 2, we found that a letter was more likely to be reported when it appeared at the previous target location than elsewhere. Crucially, this bias was similar when task context repeated (search→search-probe sequences) and when it changed (search→probe sequences). However, in these experiments participants expected a search task on most trials. Therefore, when the context changed, the expected context did not. In Experiment 3, we reversed the task probabilities (probe task on 2/3 of the trials) and in Experiment 4, we used an AABB design, such that the upcoming task was known with 100%-certainty. The bias to report the letter from the previous target location was reduced as the task-change expectation increased. Interestingly, in probe->search sequences, RTs in the search task were faster when the target appeared at the location of a previously reported letter than elsewhere, in all experiments - but this effect was not modulated by task-change expectations. Overall, our findings indicate that selecting an object proactively enhances the attentional priority at its location but expectations about the tasks' context reduce this bias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.933
Primary Topic
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How inflexible is the attentional bias towards recently selected locations?

Daniel Tolédano, Dominique Lamy
Journal of Vision
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
article

How inflexible is the attentional bias towards recently selected locations?

Daniel Tolédano, Dominique Lamy
article en

Abstract

Attention is strongly biased towards the location where a previous target was recently found. This priming-of-location (PoL) effect is thought to reflect a primitive mechanism by which selecting an object automatically and proactively enhances the attentional priority at its location. This account predicts that PoL should be unaffected by changes in task context. However, in most previous PoL studies the task context remained constant. Here, we tested this prediction using a probe paradigm. We manipulated task context by interleaving search trials where participants searched for a shape target among nontargets (2/3 of trials), search-probe trials where they reported letters briefly superimposed on the search display after a short delay (1/6), and probe trials where only the letters appeared (1/6). In Experiments 1 and 2, we found that a letter was more likely to be reported when it appeared at the previous target location than elsewhere. Crucially, this bias was similar when task context repeated (search→search-probe sequences) and when it changed (search→probe sequences). However, in these experiments participants expected a search task on most trials. Therefore, when the context changed, the expected context did not. In Experiment 3, we reversed the task probabilities (probe task on 2/3 of the trials) and in Experiment 4, we used an AABB design, such that the upcoming task was known with 100%-certainty. The bias to report the letter from the previous target location was reduced as the task-change expectation increased. Interestingly, in probe->search sequences, RTs in the search task were faster when the target appeared at the location of a previously reported letter than elsewhere, in all experiments - but this effect was not modulated by task-change expectations. Overall, our findings indicate that selecting an object proactively enhances the attentional priority at its location but expectations about the tasks' context reduce this bias.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.