Neurophysiological mechanisms of vision at the center-of-gaze in macaque V1

Almost nothing is known about the spatial structure of V1 receptive fields at the center-of-gaze, yet these neurons are the building blocks for high acuity vision. This knowledge gap is due to the technical challenges in measuring receptive fields (RFs) at the resolution of single-cone inputs present in the retina (~1 arcminute resolution). Given the distinct anatomical and physiological characteristics of foveal retina, it is possible that RFs in foveal V1 are not simply finer versions of parafoveal cells and may have distinctive aspects of visual processing. Here, we developed a model-based approach leveraging neurophysiological data to refine eye position estimates beyond the limits of hardware-based eye trackers using chronic array recordings of foveal RFs in awake fixating macaque. We presented spatiochromatic noise stimuli while recording across cortical layers, using acute laminar arrays sampling many different columns. We applied data-driven nonlinear models to investigate how subcortical inputs are integrated in V1. We recovered detailed spatial RF structure from 429 cells spanning the very center of gaze up to 2o eccentricity. Foveal V1 cells showed a diversity of RF types; some cells were unmodulated by cone-opponent signals (“luminance-only”), and others were modulated by both luminance and cone-opponent signals. RFs were as small as 4 arcminutes, with features subtending ~2 arcminutes. Luminance-only cells had the finest spatial structure RFs (median RF width = 6 arcmin) and typically showed nonlinear responses; cells modulated by cone-opponent signals integrated over larger areas (median RF width = 12 arcmin) and were more likely to be linear. Even within individual cells, the luminance component had finer spatial RF structure than the cone-opponent components, suggesting limits on spatial acuity for cone-opponent computations. Our measurements offer the first detailed observations of spatiochromatic processing in foveal V1 and offer clues to how V1 RFs are constructed from the photoreceptor mosaic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.963
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurophysiological mechanisms of vision at the center-of-gaze in macaque V1

Daniel A. Butts, Bevil R. Conway, Jacob L. Yates, Felix Bartsch et al.
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Neurophysiological mechanisms of vision at the center-of-gaze in macaque V1

Daniel A. Butts, Bevil R. Conway, Jacob L. Yates, Felix Bartsch, Ramon Bartolo Orozco, Ethan Lott
article en

Abstract

Almost nothing is known about the spatial structure of V1 receptive fields at the center-of-gaze, yet these neurons are the building blocks for high acuity vision. This knowledge gap is due to the technical challenges in measuring receptive fields (RFs) at the resolution of single-cone inputs present in the retina (~1 arcminute resolution). Given the distinct anatomical and physiological characteristics of foveal retina, it is possible that RFs in foveal V1 are not simply finer versions of parafoveal cells and may have distinctive aspects of visual processing. Here, we developed a model-based approach leveraging neurophysiological data to refine eye position estimates beyond the limits of hardware-based eye trackers using chronic array recordings of foveal RFs in awake fixating macaque. We presented spatiochromatic noise stimuli while recording across cortical layers, using acute laminar arrays sampling many different columns. We applied data-driven nonlinear models to investigate how subcortical inputs are integrated in V1. We recovered detailed spatial RF structure from 429 cells spanning the very center of gaze up to 2o eccentricity. Foveal V1 cells showed a diversity of RF types; some cells were unmodulated by cone-opponent signals (“luminance-only”), and others were modulated by both luminance and cone-opponent signals. RFs were as small as 4 arcminutes, with features subtending ~2 arcminutes. Luminance-only cells had the finest spatial structure RFs (median RF width = 6 arcmin) and typically showed nonlinear responses; cells modulated by cone-opponent signals integrated over larger areas (median RF width = 12 arcmin) and were more likely to be linear. Even within individual cells, the luminance component had finer spatial RF structure than the cone-opponent components, suggesting limits on spatial acuity for cone-opponent computations. Our measurements offer the first detailed observations of spatiochromatic processing in foveal V1 and offer clues to how V1 RFs are constructed from the photoreceptor mosaic.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
National Institutes of Health (US), Dr.Heiko Pult Optometry and Vision Research (DE), National Eye Institute (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.