Which shape features determine detectability of camouflaged radial frequency patterns?

When the texture or pattern of stationary targets is closely matched to the background, the detection of these camouflaged targets relies on identifying specific features such as the edge of its outline. Previously, we reported the results of behavioral experiments that tested the detection time of targets defined by radial frequency (RF= 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 14, and 20) and amplitude (0.1, 0.25, and 0.5) with a pink noise (1/f) texture against a pink noise background. At low amplitude, mid RF targets (i.e. 8 and 10) were among the hardest to detect. For RF≥ 8, the time taken to detect the targets decreased (targets became easier to detect) as amplitude increased. Since it is still poorly understood what aspects of a target shape influence target detectability, here the local and global features of each shape were analyzed. We calculated the global features of perimeter, area, and aspect ratio (width/height of each shape “arm”). The osculating circle method was used to compute the local curvature, its Sum-Squared Difference (SSD), and Mean of Absolute Difference (MAD). We found that target detection time as a function of the perimeter had an inverted U-shape. The area did not systematically affect detection time. The aspect ratio also had an inverted U-shape, whereby targets were easier to detect when their arm’s aspect ratio was <2. For target curvature, there was a positive correlation between SSD of the curvature and target detectability (Pearson’s r= 0.844, p <0.001), but no correlation for MAD. While the local SSD was directly correlated and most predictive, global features (perimeter and aspect ratio) can also influence detectability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1319
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which shape features determine detectability of camouflaged radial frequency patterns?

Peter John Bex, Daniel R. Coates, Samuel P. Smithers, Wei Hau Lew
1 links
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Which shape features determine detectability of camouflaged radial frequency patterns?

Peter John Bex, Daniel R. Coates, Samuel P. Smithers, Wei Hau Lew
article en

Abstract

When the texture or pattern of stationary targets is closely matched to the background, the detection of these camouflaged targets relies on identifying specific features such as the edge of its outline. Previously, we reported the results of behavioral experiments that tested the detection time of targets defined by radial frequency (RF= 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 14, and 20) and amplitude (0.1, 0.25, and 0.5) with a pink noise (1/f) texture against a pink noise background. At low amplitude, mid RF targets (i.e. 8 and 10) were among the hardest to detect. For RF≥ 8, the time taken to detect the targets decreased (targets became easier to detect) as amplitude increased. Since it is still poorly understood what aspects of a target shape influence target detectability, here the local and global features of each shape were analyzed. We calculated the global features of perimeter, area, and aspect ratio (width/height of each shape “arm”). The osculating circle method was used to compute the local curvature, its Sum-Squared Difference (SSD), and Mean of Absolute Difference (MAD). We found that target detection time as a function of the perimeter had an inverted U-shape. The area did not systematically affect detection time. The aspect ratio also had an inverted U-shape, whereby targets were easier to detect when their arm’s aspect ratio was <2. For target curvature, there was a positive correlation between SSD of the curvature and target detectability (Pearson’s r= 0.844, p <0.001), but no correlation for MAD. While the local SSD was directly correlated and most predictive, global features (perimeter and aspect ratio) can also influence detectability.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US), Northeastern University (US), University of Washington (US), University of Houston (US), Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.