Visual and auditory object recognition in relation to spatial abilities

Domain-general object recognition (o) is the ability to individuate members of an object category. Visual o is typically measured using novel objects (e.g. Greebles). Stimuli used to measure auditory o include birdsong, mechanical keyboard presses, and laughter. Previous work suggests a nearly perfect correlation across the visual and auditory modalities for this ability (Chow et al., 2023). However, until now the relationship between the two modalities has not been tested in a large sample. We also assess whether o can be distinguished from spatial ability, which has historically dominated measures of visual ability in psychometric studies. Using structural equation modeling with a large sample (n = 283), we estimate the relationships between these abilities at the construct level. We find that visual and auditory o are very closely related (r = .8, 95% CI [.68, .92]), but that this relationship is smaller once the influence of fluid intelligence (Gf) is controlled for (r = .6, 95% CI [.36, .83]). This supports the idea that visual and auditory o may rely substantially on a single cross-modal ability, but that they are nevertheless distinct. Model comparison further supports the claim that visual and auditory o are separable, as a model with distinct visual and auditory abilities had superior fit compared to a model with a single cross-modal ability. Spatial ability was measured using three tests (3D rotation, 2D rotation, paper-folding) and had sizable relationships with both visual (r = .74) and auditory (r = .69) o. However, the associations between spatial ability and both visual and auditory o were no longer significant once Gf was controlled for. O's partial independence from Gf and spatial abilities suggests that it could potentially offer incremental validity if used to predict performance in real-world domains requiring visual abilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1385
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual and auditory object recognition in relation to spatial abilities

Jason K. Chow, Conor J. R. Smithson, L. Gauthier
1 citations
Journal of Vision
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
0.20
article

Visual and auditory object recognition in relation to spatial abilities

Jason K. Chow, Conor J. R. Smithson, L. Gauthier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Domain-general object recognition (o) is the ability to individuate members of an object category. Visual o is typically measured using novel objects (e.g. Greebles). Stimuli used to measure auditory o include birdsong, mechanical keyboard presses, and laughter. Previous work suggests a nearly perfect correlation across the visual and auditory modalities for this ability (Chow et al., 2023). However, until now the relationship between the two modalities has not been tested in a large sample. We also assess whether o can be distinguished from spatial ability, which has historically dominated measures of visual ability in psychometric studies. Using structural equation modeling with a large sample (n = 283), we estimate the relationships between these abilities at the construct level. We find that visual and auditory o are very closely related (r = .8, 95% CI [.68, .92]), but that this relationship is smaller once the influence of fluid intelligence (Gf) is controlled for (r = .6, 95% CI [.36, .83]). This supports the idea that visual and auditory o may rely substantially on a single cross-modal ability, but that they are nevertheless distinct. Model comparison further supports the claim that visual and auditory o are separable, as a model with distinct visual and auditory abilities had superior fit compared to a model with a single cross-modal ability. Spatial ability was measured using three tests (3D rotation, 2D rotation, paper-folding) and had sizable relationships with both visual (r = .74) and auditory (r = .69) o. However, the associations between spatial ability and both visual and auditory o were no longer significant once Gf was controlled for. O's partial independence from Gf and spatial abilities suggests that it could potentially offer incremental validity if used to predict performance in real-world domains requiring visual abilities.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Vanderbilt University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
0.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Visual and auditory object recognition in relation to spatial abilities — Jason K. Chow, Conor J. R. Smithson, et al. · Journal of Vision (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS