Investigating the impact of Gaussian noise on face recognition performance for humans and convolutional neural networks

Recent work has shown that convolutional neural networks (CNNs) perform worse than human observers at recognizing objects presented with superimposed Gaussian noise, indicating poor alignment between CNN models and humans (Jang et al., 2021). However, it is unknown whether Gaussian noise might also disproportionately impair CNNs at tasks of face recognition, which more-heavily rely on the processing of lower-spatial-frequency information. We evaluated humans and face-trained CNNs using face images with varying levels of Gaussian noise, where noise intensity was specified by the signal to signal-plus-noise ratio (SSNR). Human participants completed a face-recognition task wherein they viewed face images of 10 different celebrities (80 images/celebrity) in an intermixed, randomized order, and were instructed to select the identity shown in each image. Each face image was presented for 200ms at a randomly-assigned SSNR level (SSNR = 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, or 1). Then, the same set of face images was presented to a face-classification trained version of AlexNet. The identity response from the CNN was indicated by the identity node for which each input image elicited the highest response. Performance for both human participants and the CNN was quantified by accuracy as a function of SSNR and was compared to the results of object recognition (Jang et al. 2021). Overall, humans exhibited better performance than the CNNs. But both humans and the CNNs better performed in face recognition than object recognition (SSNR thresholds of human: 0.17 for faces, 0.26 for objects; of CNNs: 0.25 for faces, 0.5 for objects). Moreover, face-trained model performance appeared highly similar to human, suggesting similar degrees of robustness to Gaussian visual noise. The fact that face-trained CNNs provide a reasonable account of human recognition of noisy face images may suggest that these CNNs are fairly aligned with the human face recognition system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1506
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the impact of Gaussian noise on face recognition performance for humans and convolutional neural networks

Frank Tong, Connor J. Parde, Ikhwan Jeon
Journal of Vision
Face recognition and analysis
article

Investigating the impact of Gaussian noise on face recognition performance for humans and convolutional neural networks

Frank Tong, Connor J. Parde, Ikhwan Jeon
article en

Abstract

Recent work has shown that convolutional neural networks (CNNs) perform worse than human observers at recognizing objects presented with superimposed Gaussian noise, indicating poor alignment between CNN models and humans (Jang et al., 2021). However, it is unknown whether Gaussian noise might also disproportionately impair CNNs at tasks of face recognition, which more-heavily rely on the processing of lower-spatial-frequency information. We evaluated humans and face-trained CNNs using face images with varying levels of Gaussian noise, where noise intensity was specified by the signal to signal-plus-noise ratio (SSNR). Human participants completed a face-recognition task wherein they viewed face images of 10 different celebrities (80 images/celebrity) in an intermixed, randomized order, and were instructed to select the identity shown in each image. Each face image was presented for 200ms at a randomly-assigned SSNR level (SSNR = 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, or 1). Then, the same set of face images was presented to a face-classification trained version of AlexNet. The identity response from the CNN was indicated by the identity node for which each input image elicited the highest response. Performance for both human participants and the CNN was quantified by accuracy as a function of SSNR and was compared to the results of object recognition (Jang et al. 2021). Overall, humans exhibited better performance than the CNNs. But both humans and the CNNs better performed in face recognition than object recognition (SSNR thresholds of human: 0.17 for faces, 0.26 for objects; of CNNs: 0.25 for faces, 0.5 for objects). Moreover, face-trained model performance appeared highly similar to human, suggesting similar degrees of robustness to Gaussian visual noise. The fact that face-trained CNNs provide a reasonable account of human recognition of noisy face images may suggest that these CNNs are fairly aligned with the human face recognition system.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Vanderbilt University (US), Columbia University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Face recognition and analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.