Where’s Waldo in the mind: Accessing perceptual and semantic attributes in perception and working memory.

During perception, low-level features (such as color) are processed faster than high-level features (such as semantic properties). But what about accessing information from working memory? Recent work (Kong & Fougnie, 2021) has shown that search in working memory may be distinct from visual search regarding which features are most efficient. Further, research on long-term memory (Linde-Domingo, Treder, Kerrén, & Wimber, 2019) has shown that semantic information is retrieved more rapidly than perceptual information. However, it is not yet known whether semantic properties are accessed faster from working memory than perceptual attributes. In two experiments, participants were shown four images that were either animate or inanimate objects (semantic property) and which could be in the form of a photograph or drawing (perceptual property). Participants were pre-cued (perception – Experiment 1) or post-cued (working memory – Experiment 2) to the location of one of these objects. The cues were accompanied by either a semantic (“animate or inanimate?”) or perceptual (“drawing or photograph?”) question. Unsurprisingly, perceptual aspects were discriminated faster than semantic aspects when the information was available to visual perception. However, when the task required accessing no longer presented information from working memory, participants took less time to respond to semantic than perceptual queries. These experiments, together with other recent findings, point to a reversal of the processing hierarchy for perception and memory. While visual perception is feed-forward, retrieving information in memory might first involve accessing high-level properties such as semantic categories, followed by access to lower-level visual properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.915
Primary Topic
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where’s Waldo in the mind: Accessing perceptual and semantic attributes in perception and working memory.

Ying Zhou, Aytaç Karabay, Daryl Fougnie, Edyta Sasin et al.
Journal of Vision
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
article

Where’s Waldo in the mind: Accessing perceptual and semantic attributes in perception and working memory.

Ying Zhou, Aytaç Karabay, Daryl Fougnie, Edyta Sasin, Sarina Shrestha
article en

Abstract

During perception, low-level features (such as color) are processed faster than high-level features (such as semantic properties). But what about accessing information from working memory? Recent work (Kong & Fougnie, 2021) has shown that search in working memory may be distinct from visual search regarding which features are most efficient. Further, research on long-term memory (Linde-Domingo, Treder, Kerrén, & Wimber, 2019) has shown that semantic information is retrieved more rapidly than perceptual information. However, it is not yet known whether semantic properties are accessed faster from working memory than perceptual attributes. In two experiments, participants were shown four images that were either animate or inanimate objects (semantic property) and which could be in the form of a photograph or drawing (perceptual property). Participants were pre-cued (perception – Experiment 1) or post-cued (working memory – Experiment 2) to the location of one of these objects. The cues were accompanied by either a semantic (“animate or inanimate?”) or perceptual (“drawing or photograph?”) question. Unsurprisingly, perceptual aspects were discriminated faster than semantic aspects when the information was available to visual perception. However, when the task required accessing no longer presented information from working memory, participants took less time to respond to semantic than perceptual queries. These experiments, together with other recent findings, point to a reversal of the processing hierarchy for perception and memory. While visual perception is feed-forward, retrieving information in memory might first involve accessing high-level properties such as semantic categories, followed by access to lower-level visual properties.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
New York University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.