Comparing Convolutional Neural Networks to Traditional Models of Covert Attention During Visual Search

Introduction: Performance degradation in Visual Search with an increased number of distractors (the set-size effect) is often used to make inferences about the properties of covert attention. Recently, studies have utilized Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models (Srivastava, 2023; Nicholson, 2022; Poder, 2022), although their relationship to traditional models is not well understood. Our goal is to compare CNN models to traditional models of visual search. Methods: We implement six models of covert attention during visual search to predict target detection accuracy (yes/no) in feature and conjunction tasks. For each model, we adjust the two feature searches (line angle or luminance) to match model performance. These feature values were used to build the conjunction task (angle and luminance). Three of the models are image-computable, acting directly on the pixels of the images: Image computable Bayesian ideal observer (IC-BIO), a fully-trained 5-layer CNN, and a large network trained on image classification (VGG-16 network) with transfer learning. The remaining three models operated on assumed extracted feature values (normally distributed activations from the target and each distractor): a Signal Detection Theory (SDT; Green and Swets, 1966) model without or with capacity limits (SDTc; Poder, 2019) and a Guided Search Accuracy model (GSA; Wolfe 1989; Eckstein, 2000). Results: For feature and conjunction search, the CNN and VGG-16 models showed similar set-size effects to unlimited capacity models (IC-BIO/SBIO and SDT) and smaller than the models with capacity limitations (SDTc and GSA with serial attention). The accuracy degradation from feature to conjunction search was lowest to highest for: IC-BIO, CNN, VGG-16, SDT (assuming independent processing of features; Ecktein, 1998), and SDTc. Conclusion: Our findings benchmark newer CNN models against traditional search models, showing a correspondence between CNN set-size effects and Signal Detection/Ideal Observer models but distinct feature/conjunction search accuracy relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1497
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Convolutional Neural Networks to Traditional Models of Covert Attention During Visual Search

Ansh Soni, Miguel P. Eckstein, Sudhanshu Srivastava
Journal of Vision
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Comparing Convolutional Neural Networks to Traditional Models of Covert Attention During Visual Search

Ansh Soni, Miguel P. Eckstein, Sudhanshu Srivastava
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Performance degradation in Visual Search with an increased number of distractors (the set-size effect) is often used to make inferences about the properties of covert attention. Recently, studies have utilized Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models (Srivastava, 2023; Nicholson, 2022; Poder, 2022), although their relationship to traditional models is not well understood. Our goal is to compare CNN models to traditional models of visual search. Methods: We implement six models of covert attention during visual search to predict target detection accuracy (yes/no) in feature and conjunction tasks. For each model, we adjust the two feature searches (line angle or luminance) to match model performance. These feature values were used to build the conjunction task (angle and luminance). Three of the models are image-computable, acting directly on the pixels of the images: Image computable Bayesian ideal observer (IC-BIO), a fully-trained 5-layer CNN, and a large network trained on image classification (VGG-16 network) with transfer learning. The remaining three models operated on assumed extracted feature values (normally distributed activations from the target and each distractor): a Signal Detection Theory (SDT; Green and Swets, 1966) model without or with capacity limits (SDTc; Poder, 2019) and a Guided Search Accuracy model (GSA; Wolfe 1989; Eckstein, 2000). Results: For feature and conjunction search, the CNN and VGG-16 models showed similar set-size effects to unlimited capacity models (IC-BIO/SBIO and SDT) and smaller than the models with capacity limitations (SDTc and GSA with serial attention). The accuracy degradation from feature to conjunction search was lowest to highest for: IC-BIO, CNN, VGG-16, SDT (assuming independent processing of features; Ecktein, 1998), and SDTc. Conclusion: Our findings benchmark newer CNN models against traditional search models, showing a correspondence between CNN set-size effects and Signal Detection/Ideal Observer models but distinct feature/conjunction search accuracy relationships.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.