Can covert and explicit “leaders” steer and split real human crowds?

Collective motion in human crowds is a self-organizing phenomenon that emerges from local visual interactions between neighboring pedestrians. In our previous work, we developed a method of reconstructing spatially-embedded visual influence networks and quantifying local and global influence. We found that some positions in the crowd are more influential than others (“emergent leadership”), as are some participants (“individual leadership”). To test these influential positions, here we experimentally manipulate leadership and network topology in real crowds. In each session, a group of participants (N=16 to 22) was instructed to walk across a field together. One to four confederates, whose presence was either unknown (covert leaders) or visually specified (explicit leaders), turned midway through the trial. In each trial, they received instructions about their initial position (e.g., front or middle of crowd, left/right/center) and turn direction (right, left, no change) via smart watches, and when to initiate the turn via pagers. Head positions were recorded using a Mavic 3 drone with a top-down video camera (60 Hz). To analyze the video recordings, we developed a data processing and analysis pipeline. We trained a convolutional neural network model that uses a multiple-object tracking framework to detect the locations of participants and extract their trajectories (tracklets) and identities. We then used our previous network reconstruction methods to recover visual influence networks and analyze leadership and crowd dynamics. The results show that confederates exerted more influence than non-confederates, particularly when they occupied influential positions. Covert and explicit leaders altered the network topology. We are currently comparing the ability of confederates to steer and split the crowd with predictions from our multiagent simulations of our collective motion model. The results have potential applications to directing emergency evacuations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1325
Primary Topic
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can covert and explicit “leaders” steer and split real human crowds?

William H. Warren, Kei Yoshida, H. T. Taylor
Journal of Vision
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
article

Can covert and explicit “leaders” steer and split real human crowds?

William H. Warren, Kei Yoshida, H. T. Taylor
article en

Abstract

Collective motion in human crowds is a self-organizing phenomenon that emerges from local visual interactions between neighboring pedestrians. In our previous work, we developed a method of reconstructing spatially-embedded visual influence networks and quantifying local and global influence. We found that some positions in the crowd are more influential than others (“emergent leadership”), as are some participants (“individual leadership”). To test these influential positions, here we experimentally manipulate leadership and network topology in real crowds. In each session, a group of participants (N=16 to 22) was instructed to walk across a field together. One to four confederates, whose presence was either unknown (covert leaders) or visually specified (explicit leaders), turned midway through the trial. In each trial, they received instructions about their initial position (e.g., front or middle of crowd, left/right/center) and turn direction (right, left, no change) via smart watches, and when to initiate the turn via pagers. Head positions were recorded using a Mavic 3 drone with a top-down video camera (60 Hz). To analyze the video recordings, we developed a data processing and analysis pipeline. We trained a convolutional neural network model that uses a multiple-object tracking framework to detect the locations of participants and extract their trajectories (tracklets) and identities. We then used our previous network reconstruction methods to recover visual influence networks and analyze leadership and crowd dynamics. The results show that confederates exerted more influence than non-confederates, particularly when they occupied influential positions. Covert and explicit leaders altered the network topology. We are currently comparing the ability of confederates to steer and split the crowd with predictions from our multiagent simulations of our collective motion model. The results have potential applications to directing emergency evacuations.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
John Brown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can covert and explicit “leaders” steer and split real human crowds? — William H. Warren, Kei Yoshida, et al. · Journal of Vision (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS