Comparison of semi and fully automated artificial intelligence driven softwares and manual system for cephalometric analysis
There is a lack of significant difference among manual, semiautomatic and fully automatic methods of cephalometric tracing and analysis in terms of the variables measured by these methods. The mean detection errors were the highest for manual analysis and lowest for fully automatic method. Hence the fully automatic AI software has the most reproducible and accurate results.
Authors
- Hafiza Zobia Shafique
- Tooba Zahoor
- Rooma Shahid
- Zahra Khalid (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8044-5741)
- Mehak Hassan
- Rumeesha Zaheer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4525-1108)
- Ramsha Nawaz
- Abdullah Jan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1087-9299)
Institutions
- Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (PK)
- National University of Medical Sciences (PK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Published
- 2024-09-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02664-3
- Citations
- 8
- Primary Topic
- Dental Radiography and Imaging
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.95