Dual trigger or hCG alone: A retrospective analysis on patients with diminished ovarian reserve under in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment

Neither the intermediate nor implantation outcomes were improved by dual-trigger. The OR values were 1.08 (95 % CI: 0.41-2.78) for retrieval cancellation, 1.33 (95 % CI: 0.89-2.00) for oocyte harvest, 1.04(95 %CI: 0.94-1.15) for viable embryo and 1.03(95 %CI: 0.88-1.19) for top-quality embryo. Similarly, the ORs were 0.90 (95 %CI: 0.62-1.30) for implantation and 0.97 (95 %CI: 0.56-1.69) for clinical pregnancy. This equivalence remained unchanged after adjusting for the covariates such as age, BMI, controlled ovarian stimulation protocols, etc. Thus, dual-trigger cannot provide significant advantage over hCG in related to immediate or clinical outcomes of IVF-ET treatments in DOR patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.039
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual trigger or hCG alone: A retrospective analysis on patients with diminished ovarian reserve under in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment

Mengxia Ji, Zhen Jin, Ling Zhang, Limei Wu et al.
2 citations
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
1.09
article

Dual trigger or hCG alone: A retrospective analysis on patients with diminished ovarian reserve under in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment

Mengxia Ji, Zhen Jin, Ling Zhang, Limei Wu, Weihai Xu, Xiaohua Fu, Shishi Li, Yi-Dan Wu, Lin Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Neither the intermediate nor implantation outcomes were improved by dual-trigger. The OR values were 1.08 (95 % CI: 0.41-2.78) for retrieval cancellation, 1.33 (95 % CI: 0.89-2.00) for oocyte harvest, 1.04(95 %CI: 0.94-1.15) for viable embryo and 1.03(95 %CI: 0.88-1.19) for top-quality embryo. Similarly, the ORs were 0.90 (95 %CI: 0.62-1.30) for implantation and 0.97 (95 %CI: 0.56-1.69) for clinical pregnancy. This equivalence remained unchanged after adjusting for the covariates such as age, BMI, controlled ovarian stimulation protocols, etc. Thus, dual-trigger cannot provide significant advantage over hCG in related to immediate or clinical outcomes of IVF-ET treatments in DOR patients.

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyVol. 302
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Hangzhou Medical College (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dual trigger or hCG alone: A retrospective analysis on patients with diminished ovarian reserve under in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment — Mengxia Ji, Zhen Jin, et al. · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS