Dual trigger or hCG alone: A retrospective analysis on patients with diminished ovarian reserve under in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment
Neither the intermediate nor implantation outcomes were improved by dual-trigger. The OR values were 1.08 (95 % CI: 0.41-2.78) for retrieval cancellation, 1.33 (95 % CI: 0.89-2.00) for oocyte harvest, 1.04(95 %CI: 0.94-1.15) for viable embryo and 1.03(95 %CI: 0.88-1.19) for top-quality embryo. Similarly, the ORs were 0.90 (95 %CI: 0.62-1.30) for implantation and 0.97 (95 %CI: 0.56-1.69) for clinical pregnancy. This equivalence remained unchanged after adjusting for the covariates such as age, BMI, controlled ovarian stimulation protocols, etc. Thus, dual-trigger cannot provide significant advantage over hCG in related to immediate or clinical outcomes of IVF-ET treatments in DOR patients.
Authors
- Mengxia Ji (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9282-4415)
- Zhen Jin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3647-9845)
- Ling Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7917-7671)
- Limei Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1378-740X)
- Weihai Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5238-6521)
- Xiaohua Fu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9132-7137)
- Shishi Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4763-0419)
- Yi-Dan Wu
- Lin Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2064-8440)
Institutions
- Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
- Hangzhou Medical College (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Published
- 2024-09-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.039
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.09