Representation of navigational affordances and ego-motion in the occipital place area

Humans effortlessly use vision to plan and guide navigation through the local environment, or “scene”. A network of three cortical regions respond selectively to visual scene information, including the occipital place area (OPA), parahippocampal place area (PPA), and retrosplenial complex (RSC) – but how this network supports visually-guided navigation is unclear. Recent evidence suggests that one region in particular, the OPA, supports visual representations for navigation, while PPA and RSC support other aspects of scene processing. However, most previous studies tested only static scene images which lack the dynamic experience of navigating through scenes. Accordingly, here we used dynamic movie stimuli to test whether OPA, PPA, and RSC represent two critical kinds of navigationally-relevant information: navigational affordances (e.g., can I walk to the left or right?) and ego-motion (e.g., am I turning left or right?). We found that OPA is sensitive to both affordances and ego-motion, as well as the conflict between these cues – e.g., turning toward versus away from an open doorway. These effects were significantly weaker or absent in PPA and RSC. Responses in OPA were also dissociable from those in early visual cortex, consistent with the idea that OPA responses are not merely explained by lower-level visual features. OPA responses to affordances and ego-motion were stronger in the contralateral than ipsilateral visual field, suggesting that OPA encodes navigationally relevant information within an egocentric reference frame. Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that OPA contains visual representations that are useful for planning and guiding navigation through scenes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.568
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representation of navigational affordances and ego-motion in the occipital place area

Nancy Kanwisher, Emily M. Chen, Rebecca Saxe, Frederik S. Kamps
Journal of Vision
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
article

Representation of navigational affordances and ego-motion in the occipital place area

Nancy Kanwisher, Emily M. Chen, Rebecca Saxe, Frederik S. Kamps
article en

Abstract

Humans effortlessly use vision to plan and guide navigation through the local environment, or “scene”. A network of three cortical regions respond selectively to visual scene information, including the occipital place area (OPA), parahippocampal place area (PPA), and retrosplenial complex (RSC) – but how this network supports visually-guided navigation is unclear. Recent evidence suggests that one region in particular, the OPA, supports visual representations for navigation, while PPA and RSC support other aspects of scene processing. However, most previous studies tested only static scene images which lack the dynamic experience of navigating through scenes. Accordingly, here we used dynamic movie stimuli to test whether OPA, PPA, and RSC represent two critical kinds of navigationally-relevant information: navigational affordances (e.g., can I walk to the left or right?) and ego-motion (e.g., am I turning left or right?). We found that OPA is sensitive to both affordances and ego-motion, as well as the conflict between these cues – e.g., turning toward versus away from an open doorway. These effects were significantly weaker or absent in PPA and RSC. Responses in OPA were also dissociable from those in early visual cortex, consistent with the idea that OPA responses are not merely explained by lower-level visual features. OPA responses to affordances and ego-motion were stronger in the contralateral than ipsilateral visual field, suggesting that OPA encodes navigationally relevant information within an egocentric reference frame. Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that OPA contains visual representations that are useful for planning and guiding navigation through scenes.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.