Motion-induced spatial shifts and motion-based contrast enhancement are linked.

Two lines of research on the effects of motion on spatial vision have developed largely independently. Motion induces a forward shift in the apparent spatial location of moving pattern (Ramachandran & Anstis, 1990; De Valois & De Valois, 1991). Also, moving pattern appears less blurred than might be expected from temporal summation or visual persistence (Burr, 1980). This might be explained by spatial summation along the motion trajectory (Nishida et al., 2007). Here we describe evidence that the two phenomena may be connected. We constructed a tripartite stimulus consisting of an array of square binary blocks (2 pixel; 0.039 × 0.039 deg) in a fixed window on a mean luminance grey background. The central rows translated by one or more blocks while the rows in the upper and lower third of the array randomly updated from frame to frame. Thus each frame appeared as an undifferentiated random block array and the temporal properties of the translating and updating blocks were identical. Participants reported whether the moving pattern or the flanking updating regions appeared to have the higher contrast. The contrast of the randomly updating pattern was varied by a staircase procedure to determine the matching contrast. We found the apparent contrast of the moving pattern was generally higher than the updating pattern. The effect was greater for slower speeds and for lower contrasts. We also measured the apparent spatial shift of the translating section relative to the updating section using a staircase method while varying the drifting section position. The spatial shift was greater for lower contrasts. Since the same participants contributed to both experiments, we used repeated measures correlation to compare scores over participants and conditions. We found a high correlation (0.69, p<0.001) between the spatial shift as a proportion of the pattern displacement and the apparent contrast enhancement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.539
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motion-induced spatial shifts and motion-based contrast enhancement are linked.

Alan Johnston, Dan Hu
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Motion-induced spatial shifts and motion-based contrast enhancement are linked.

Alan Johnston, Dan Hu
article en

Abstract

Two lines of research on the effects of motion on spatial vision have developed largely independently. Motion induces a forward shift in the apparent spatial location of moving pattern (Ramachandran & Anstis, 1990; De Valois & De Valois, 1991). Also, moving pattern appears less blurred than might be expected from temporal summation or visual persistence (Burr, 1980). This might be explained by spatial summation along the motion trajectory (Nishida et al., 2007). Here we describe evidence that the two phenomena may be connected. We constructed a tripartite stimulus consisting of an array of square binary blocks (2 pixel; 0.039 × 0.039 deg) in a fixed window on a mean luminance grey background. The central rows translated by one or more blocks while the rows in the upper and lower third of the array randomly updated from frame to frame. Thus each frame appeared as an undifferentiated random block array and the temporal properties of the translating and updating blocks were identical. Participants reported whether the moving pattern or the flanking updating regions appeared to have the higher contrast. The contrast of the randomly updating pattern was varied by a staircase procedure to determine the matching contrast. We found the apparent contrast of the moving pattern was generally higher than the updating pattern. The effect was greater for slower speeds and for lower contrasts. We also measured the apparent spatial shift of the translating section relative to the updating section using a staircase method while varying the drifting section position. The spatial shift was greater for lower contrasts. Since the same participants contributed to both experiments, we used repeated measures correlation to compare scores over participants and conditions. We found a high correlation (0.69, p<0.001) between the spatial shift as a proportion of the pattern displacement and the apparent contrast enhancement.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Nottingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.