3D shape recognition in humans and deep neural networks

Both humans and deep neural networks can recognize objects from 3D shapes depicted with sparse visual information, such as a set of points randomly sampled on the surfaces of 3D objects (termed point cloud). Although networks achieve human-like performance for recognizing objects from 3D shapes, it is unclear whether network models acquire similar 3D shape representations to human vision for object recognition. We hypothesize that training neural networks enable the model to gain access to some local 3D shape features and distinctive parts associated with objects, which are adequate to provide good object recognition performance. However, the networks lack representations of the global 3D shapes of objects. We conducted two experiments to test this hypothesis. In Experiment 1, we created Lego-style point clouds to mimic object shapes constructed by Legos. Lego-style 3D objects disrupt local shape features but preserve the global 3D shape of objects. Point clouds of Lego-style objects were shown to both human participants and a dynamic graph convolutional neural network (DGCNN) trained to recognize 3D objects from point cloud displays. Humans maintained high recognition performance when the disruption of local shape was moderate (e.g., the size of Lego pieces was small) (recognition performance for intact 3D shapes: 90% vs. Lego shapes 89%). In contrast, the DGCNN performance dropped significantly, from 90% to 54%. In Experiment 2, we spatially scrambled object parts to disrupt the global 3D shape. We found the opposite result: human recognition performance for part-scrambled displays significantly worsened, but the neural network showed similar recognition performance for the part-scrambled objects when recognizing objects from intact 3D shapes. Hence, the two experiments provide double-dissociation results to show that human object recognition relies on global 3D shapes, but neural networks learn to recognize 3D objects from local shape features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.735
Primary Topic
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D shape recognition in humans and deep neural networks

Shuhao Fu, Hongjing Lu, Philip J. Kellman, Daniel Tjan
Journal of Vision
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
article

3D shape recognition in humans and deep neural networks

Shuhao Fu, Hongjing Lu, Philip J. Kellman, Daniel Tjan
article en

Abstract

Both humans and deep neural networks can recognize objects from 3D shapes depicted with sparse visual information, such as a set of points randomly sampled on the surfaces of 3D objects (termed point cloud). Although networks achieve human-like performance for recognizing objects from 3D shapes, it is unclear whether network models acquire similar 3D shape representations to human vision for object recognition. We hypothesize that training neural networks enable the model to gain access to some local 3D shape features and distinctive parts associated with objects, which are adequate to provide good object recognition performance. However, the networks lack representations of the global 3D shapes of objects. We conducted two experiments to test this hypothesis. In Experiment 1, we created Lego-style point clouds to mimic object shapes constructed by Legos. Lego-style 3D objects disrupt local shape features but preserve the global 3D shape of objects. Point clouds of Lego-style objects were shown to both human participants and a dynamic graph convolutional neural network (DGCNN) trained to recognize 3D objects from point cloud displays. Humans maintained high recognition performance when the disruption of local shape was moderate (e.g., the size of Lego pieces was small) (recognition performance for intact 3D shapes: 90% vs. Lego shapes 89%). In contrast, the DGCNN performance dropped significantly, from 90% to 54%. In Experiment 2, we spatially scrambled object parts to disrupt the global 3D shape. We found the opposite result: human recognition performance for part-scrambled displays significantly worsened, but the neural network showed similar recognition performance for the part-scrambled objects when recognizing objects from intact 3D shapes. Hence, the two experiments provide double-dissociation results to show that human object recognition relies on global 3D shapes, but neural networks learn to recognize 3D objects from local shape features.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), Cerritos College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.