Support for and application of a measure of neural efficiency in visual processing

One theme in our work characterizing the real-time characteristics of perceptual processes is the measurement of capacity, or the effects of variations in workload on processing efficiency. A core component is the hazard function of the reaction time (RT) distribution along with its integral. The former can be interpreted as an instantaneous measure of work (known as the intensity function) and the latter can be interpreted as a cumulative measure of work. We have applied this approach to a range of visual tasks, from low-level perceptual learning to high-level face perception. Here we extend that work to combine electroencephalographic (EEG) measures of brain activity and RT to form a neural efficiency score: a ratio of the hazard function of the RT distribution and the instantaneous global field power (GFP) of the EEG. This ratio measures the relationship between work accomplished and brain energy expended to perform that work. We begin by showing that the GFP can be used as a proxy for energy expended by reanalyzing data from a visual Sternberg task performed while simultaneous EEG and metabolic data were recorded.The latter allowed us to quantify metabolic energy expended (in Mj/m), and we compared this against the GFP. We show that there is a strong linear relationship between these two measures, supporting the use of the GFP in quantifying neural efficiency. We then apply this measure to data from a visual contrast detection task performed by women who were either iron deficient and non-anemic or iron sufficien, and show that neural efficiency is related to contrast thresholds and systematically differs as a function of iron status. This suggests the potential for broad use of this measure for both basic and applied questions in vision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.617
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Support for and application of a measure of neural efficiency in visual processing

Michael J. Wenger, James T. Townsend, Sarah Newbolds
Journal of Vision
Neural Networks and Applications
article

Support for and application of a measure of neural efficiency in visual processing

Michael J. Wenger, James T. Townsend, Sarah Newbolds
article en

Abstract

One theme in our work characterizing the real-time characteristics of perceptual processes is the measurement of capacity, or the effects of variations in workload on processing efficiency. A core component is the hazard function of the reaction time (RT) distribution along with its integral. The former can be interpreted as an instantaneous measure of work (known as the intensity function) and the latter can be interpreted as a cumulative measure of work. We have applied this approach to a range of visual tasks, from low-level perceptual learning to high-level face perception. Here we extend that work to combine electroencephalographic (EEG) measures of brain activity and RT to form a neural efficiency score: a ratio of the hazard function of the RT distribution and the instantaneous global field power (GFP) of the EEG. This ratio measures the relationship between work accomplished and brain energy expended to perform that work. We begin by showing that the GFP can be used as a proxy for energy expended by reanalyzing data from a visual Sternberg task performed while simultaneous EEG and metabolic data were recorded.The latter allowed us to quantify metabolic energy expended (in Mj/m), and we compared this against the GFP. We show that there is a strong linear relationship between these two measures, supporting the use of the GFP in quantifying neural efficiency. We then apply this measure to data from a visual contrast detection task performed by women who were either iron deficient and non-anemic or iron sufficien, and show that neural efficiency is related to contrast thresholds and systematically differs as a function of iron status. This suggests the potential for broad use of this measure for both basic and applied questions in vision.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Indiana University (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Neural Networks and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.