Homeostatic and Hebbian plasticity are related in adult humans

Introduction: Homeostatic and Hebbian plasticity co-operate during the critical period, refining neuronal circuits, however the interaction between these two forms of plasticity is still unclear, especially in adulthood. Here we investigate directly this issue in adult humans using two consolidated paradigms to elicit each form of plasticity: the LTP-like change of the visual evoked potential (Kirk et al 2021) and the shift of ocular dominance induced by short-term monocular deprivation (Baroncelli & Lunghi 2021). Methods: We tested three different conditions in a group (N=17) of adult volunteers (counterbalanced order). In the homeostatic condition, we measured ocular dominance (binocular rivalry between gratings, 2°, 2cpd, 64% contrast) before and after 1h of monocular deprivation (MD). In the Hebbian condition, we measured visual evoked potentials (VEP) in response to flashed (mean rate 1Hz) visual stimuli (checkerboard: 4°, 2 cpd, 64% contrast) presented binocularly in the upper visual field, before and after a 2-min high-frequency visual stimulation (HFS, checkerboard flickering at 9Hz). The mixed condition was similar to the homeostatic condition, except that HFS was delivered just before MD. Results: In the homeostatic and hebbian conditions we confirmed that the two experimental paradigms successfully induced each form of plasticity: ocular dominance shifted in favor of the deprived eye after MD (t(16)=8.23, p<0.001), and the amplitude of the N1b component of the VEP was reduced after HFS (t(16)=-2.569, p=0.021). Importantly, across participants, the effect of MD and the effect of HFS were correlated (r=-0.538, p=0.026). In the mixed condition, the effect of MD was comparable to the homeostatic condition (t(16)=-0.138, p=0.892). Conclusion: Homeostatic and Hebbian plasticity correlate in amplitude in adult humans, but they do not seem to interact when induced simultaneously. The relationship between these two forms of plasticity can explain the success of homeostatic plasticity based paradigms for the treatment of adult amblyopia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.612
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Homeostatic and Hebbian plasticity are related in adult humans

Claudia Lunghi, Antoine Prosper
Journal of Vision
Children's Physical and Motor Development
article

Homeostatic and Hebbian plasticity are related in adult humans

Claudia Lunghi, Antoine Prosper
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Homeostatic and Hebbian plasticity co-operate during the critical period, refining neuronal circuits, however the interaction between these two forms of plasticity is still unclear, especially in adulthood. Here we investigate directly this issue in adult humans using two consolidated paradigms to elicit each form of plasticity: the LTP-like change of the visual evoked potential (Kirk et al 2021) and the shift of ocular dominance induced by short-term monocular deprivation (Baroncelli & Lunghi 2021). Methods: We tested three different conditions in a group (N=17) of adult volunteers (counterbalanced order). In the homeostatic condition, we measured ocular dominance (binocular rivalry between gratings, 2°, 2cpd, 64% contrast) before and after 1h of monocular deprivation (MD). In the Hebbian condition, we measured visual evoked potentials (VEP) in response to flashed (mean rate 1Hz) visual stimuli (checkerboard: 4°, 2 cpd, 64% contrast) presented binocularly in the upper visual field, before and after a 2-min high-frequency visual stimulation (HFS, checkerboard flickering at 9Hz). The mixed condition was similar to the homeostatic condition, except that HFS was delivered just before MD. Results: In the homeostatic and hebbian conditions we confirmed that the two experimental paradigms successfully induced each form of plasticity: ocular dominance shifted in favor of the deprived eye after MD (t(16)=8.23, p<0.001), and the amplitude of the N1b component of the VEP was reduced after HFS (t(16)=-2.569, p=0.021). Importantly, across participants, the effect of MD and the effect of HFS were correlated (r=-0.538, p=0.026). In the mixed condition, the effect of MD was comparable to the homeostatic condition (t(16)=-0.138, p=0.892). Conclusion: Homeostatic and Hebbian plasticity correlate in amplitude in adult humans, but they do not seem to interact when induced simultaneously. The relationship between these two forms of plasticity can explain the success of homeostatic plasticity based paradigms for the treatment of adult amblyopia.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Laboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs (FR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.