Persistent resampling of external information despite twenty-five repetitions of the same search templates

We commonly load visual working memory minimally when to-be-remembered information remains available in the external world. In visual search, this is characterised by both encoding novel (externally available) templates during search and revisiting previously encoded templates. When all search templates have been encoded, subsequent rehearsal should lead to even stronger representations in memory, eventually making the (re)inspection of templates redundant. To test whether repetition indeed leads to decreased external sampling, participants (n=15) searched for 1, 2, and 4 search templates which remained available throughout trials. Critically, each unique set of search templates was repeated 25 trials consecutively. When presented with a novel template set, participants primarily encoded and searched templates one-by-one. Although the number of inspections and inspection durations initially decreased significantly as template sets were repeated, behaviour largely stabilised between the tenth and last repetition and participants still frequently resampled templates. In Experiment 2, participants (n=14) performed the same task, but could not inspect templates in the last 10 repetitions. Strikingly, accuracy remained high when templates could not be resampled, although the number of inspections decreased faster than in Experiment 1. This suggests that participants prepared for template removal by encoding templates more elaborately before the cut-off point. Across both experiments, resampling was linked to increased response times and no benefit to accuracy. Furthermore, participants could draw from long-term memory for the search task, as indicated by above-chance level recognition of template sets ten minutes after the main experiment finished. We thus argue that external sampling is not only used to offload effortful working memory maintenance, but also to boost confidence in existing (long-term) memory content. These findings demonstrate the persistence with which we sample information from the external world rather than rely on memory – even when we repeatedly need that same information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.854
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Persistent resampling of external information despite twenty-five repetitions of the same search templates

A. Hoogerbrugge, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Tanja C.W. Nijboer, Christoph Strauch
1 citations
Journal of Vision
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
0.78
article

Persistent resampling of external information despite twenty-five repetitions of the same search templates

A. Hoogerbrugge, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Tanja C.W. Nijboer, Christoph Strauch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We commonly load visual working memory minimally when to-be-remembered information remains available in the external world. In visual search, this is characterised by both encoding novel (externally available) templates during search and revisiting previously encoded templates. When all search templates have been encoded, subsequent rehearsal should lead to even stronger representations in memory, eventually making the (re)inspection of templates redundant. To test whether repetition indeed leads to decreased external sampling, participants (n=15) searched for 1, 2, and 4 search templates which remained available throughout trials. Critically, each unique set of search templates was repeated 25 trials consecutively. When presented with a novel template set, participants primarily encoded and searched templates one-by-one. Although the number of inspections and inspection durations initially decreased significantly as template sets were repeated, behaviour largely stabilised between the tenth and last repetition and participants still frequently resampled templates. In Experiment 2, participants (n=14) performed the same task, but could not inspect templates in the last 10 repetitions. Strikingly, accuracy remained high when templates could not be resampled, although the number of inspections decreased faster than in Experiment 1. This suggests that participants prepared for template removal by encoding templates more elaborately before the cut-off point. Across both experiments, resampling was linked to increased response times and no benefit to accuracy. Furthermore, participants could draw from long-term memory for the search task, as indicated by above-chance level recognition of template sets ten minutes after the main experiment finished. We thus argue that external sampling is not only used to offload effortful working memory maintenance, but also to boost confidence in existing (long-term) memory content. These findings demonstrate the persistence with which we sample information from the external world rather than rely on memory – even when we repeatedly need that same information.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Utrecht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.