A blue-light absorbing lens improves visual function under bright light conditions in pseudophakic patients

Introduction: This study evaluated the visual performance of a blue-light filter (BLF). The following visual parameters were assessed: glare disability (GD); chromatic contrast (CC); two-point light thresholds; and dysphotopsia symptoms (halo and spoke diameter). Methods: Twenty-five pseudophakic patients previously implanted with a ‘UV-only’ intraocular lens (IOL) (cut off frequency at 397nm with no visible spectra filtering) were tested using a single-masked randomized cross-over design. In the control condition, a similar UV-only filter (not filtering any visible wavelength) was used. In the test condition, a BLF was used (matching the absorbance profile of a common BLF IOL; Acrysof Natural and Clareon; Alcon Research Ltd). The Intensity of broad-band xenon light (annulus) and a sky-blue background needed to veil a central grating target was used to measure GD and CC, respectively. The diameter of spokes/haloes was determined by measuring their lateral extent induced by a bright white point source. Two-point light thresholds were measured as the separation between two small relatively intense point sources of light (Rayleigh criterion). Results. All of the visual functions measured favored the BLF when compared to the UV-only filter (p<0.001). Conclusion: About 6% and 10% more light energy was needed to occlude the grating stimulus for GD and CC. The light spread measured using the two-point technique was about 26% less for the BLF. The BLF reduced haloing and spokes by about 24% and 19%. The BLF significantly improved function across a variety of visual indices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.643
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A blue-light absorbing lens improves visual function under bright light conditions in pseudophakic patients

Lisa M. Renzi‐Hammond, Jacob B. Harth, Billy R. Hammond
2 citations
Journal of Vision
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
0.77
article

A blue-light absorbing lens improves visual function under bright light conditions in pseudophakic patients

Lisa M. Renzi‐Hammond, Jacob B. Harth, Billy R. Hammond
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluated the visual performance of a blue-light filter (BLF). The following visual parameters were assessed: glare disability (GD); chromatic contrast (CC); two-point light thresholds; and dysphotopsia symptoms (halo and spoke diameter). Methods: Twenty-five pseudophakic patients previously implanted with a ‘UV-only’ intraocular lens (IOL) (cut off frequency at 397nm with no visible spectra filtering) were tested using a single-masked randomized cross-over design. In the control condition, a similar UV-only filter (not filtering any visible wavelength) was used. In the test condition, a BLF was used (matching the absorbance profile of a common BLF IOL; Acrysof Natural and Clareon; Alcon Research Ltd). The Intensity of broad-band xenon light (annulus) and a sky-blue background needed to veil a central grating target was used to measure GD and CC, respectively. The diameter of spokes/haloes was determined by measuring their lateral extent induced by a bright white point source. Two-point light thresholds were measured as the separation between two small relatively intense point sources of light (Rayleigh criterion). Results. All of the visual functions measured favored the BLF when compared to the UV-only filter (p<0.001). Conclusion: About 6% and 10% more light energy was needed to occlude the grating stimulus for GD and CC. The light spread measured using the two-point technique was about 26% less for the BLF. The BLF reduced haloing and spokes by about 24% and 19%. The BLF significantly improved function across a variety of visual indices.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
0.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.