Knowing what you missed in mixed hybrid visual search

Mixed-hybrid search is a model task for investigating errors in everyday visual search when simultaneously searching for multiple types of targets (e.g., finding a specific freeway exit while also searching for the category of “obstacles” such as barriers, workers, or raccoons). In mixed hybrid search, people are better at finding specific items but often miss the more categorical targets. Using methodologies from the Inattentional Blindness literature, a previous study found that when participants miss items during search, they can identify the correct item significantly above chance in a subsequent 2AFC identification task, even while reporting little or no awareness of missing any items. What type of information is retained about these missed items that later enables one to identify them correctly? Might participants have rough categorical representations about the missed item, even when guessing about the specific item within the category? Our participants searched for two specific items and two categories of items with 0, 1, or 2 targets present. Stimuli were visible until participants responded. Following each trial, participants rated their confidence in their search response (0-100), then performed a 2 or 6AFC task to identify potential missed targets. Finally, they reported their confidence in their forced-choice selections. In the 6AFC task for categorical missed targets, participants identified the exact missed item 46% of the time (chance is 16.6%, t(12)=5.1, p=0.003). Participants correctly answered the 6AFC when uncertain about their search performance (34 on a 100-point confidence scale). However, when confident that no target was missed (confidence 88), they guessed in the 6AFC task, both about the item and the category (40%, chance=40%). Overall, observers have some awareness of missed information in search even if the search is self-terminated. However, when they are sure they missed nothing, there does not appear to be any subsequently recoverable information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.557
Primary Topic
Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowing what you missed in mixed hybrid visual search

Jeremy M. Wolfe, Ava Mitra
Journal of Vision
Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
article

Knowing what you missed in mixed hybrid visual search

Jeremy M. Wolfe, Ava Mitra
article en

Abstract

Mixed-hybrid search is a model task for investigating errors in everyday visual search when simultaneously searching for multiple types of targets (e.g., finding a specific freeway exit while also searching for the category of “obstacles” such as barriers, workers, or raccoons). In mixed hybrid search, people are better at finding specific items but often miss the more categorical targets. Using methodologies from the Inattentional Blindness literature, a previous study found that when participants miss items during search, they can identify the correct item significantly above chance in a subsequent 2AFC identification task, even while reporting little or no awareness of missing any items. What type of information is retained about these missed items that later enables one to identify them correctly? Might participants have rough categorical representations about the missed item, even when guessing about the specific item within the category? Our participants searched for two specific items and two categories of items with 0, 1, or 2 targets present. Stimuli were visible until participants responded. Following each trial, participants rated their confidence in their search response (0-100), then performed a 2 or 6AFC task to identify potential missed targets. Finally, they reported their confidence in their forced-choice selections. In the 6AFC task for categorical missed targets, participants identified the exact missed item 46% of the time (chance is 16.6%, t(12)=5.1, p=0.003). Participants correctly answered the 6AFC when uncertain about their search performance (34 on a 100-point confidence scale). However, when confident that no target was missed (confidence 88), they guessed in the 6AFC task, both about the item and the category (40%, chance=40%). Overall, observers have some awareness of missed information in search even if the search is self-terminated. However, when they are sure they missed nothing, there does not appear to be any subsequently recoverable information.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Knowing what you missed in mixed hybrid visual search — Jeremy M. Wolfe, Ava Mitra · Journal of Vision (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS