You see first what you like most: Visually prioritizing positive over negative semantic stimuli

In our complex world, we often encounter situations with multiple objects almost simultaneously entering our visual fields. Identifying the temporal order of these stimuli is thus crucial for scene and event segmentation, and guiding task prioritization. Attending to a stimulus has been found to make it perceived earlier than others, with various attention-modulating factors contributing to this advantage (e.g., reward, ownership, perceived spatial depth). However, the impact of affective valences (positivity or negativity), a significant subjective factor influencing attention selection and processing speed, on temporal order perception remains unexplored. To investigate this issue, we used a cueless Temporal Order Judgement (TOJ) task in three experiments. Observers always saw two Chinese characters on the left and right sides of a central fixation, and there was a variable onset delay between the two characters, ranging between 0 ms and 100 ms (in 20 ms intervals). The observers were instructed to indicate which of the two stimuli appeared first. Different pairs of stimuli valences were used in each experiment: positive and negative (Experiment 1), positive and neutral (Experiment 2), and negative and neutral (Experiment 3). The results of the first and second experiments indicated that people reliably perceived positive stimuli earlier than negative stimuli but not neutral stimuli; the third experiment showed that neutral stimuli were perceived earlier when presented with another negative one. Our findings revealed a general temporal prioritization towards semantically positive stimuli modulated by the strength of affective contrasts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.616
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

You see first what you like most: Visually prioritizing positive over negative semantic stimuli

Jay Pratt, Sihan He
Journal of Vision
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
article

You see first what you like most: Visually prioritizing positive over negative semantic stimuli

Jay Pratt, Sihan He
article en

Abstract

In our complex world, we often encounter situations with multiple objects almost simultaneously entering our visual fields. Identifying the temporal order of these stimuli is thus crucial for scene and event segmentation, and guiding task prioritization. Attending to a stimulus has been found to make it perceived earlier than others, with various attention-modulating factors contributing to this advantage (e.g., reward, ownership, perceived spatial depth). However, the impact of affective valences (positivity or negativity), a significant subjective factor influencing attention selection and processing speed, on temporal order perception remains unexplored. To investigate this issue, we used a cueless Temporal Order Judgement (TOJ) task in three experiments. Observers always saw two Chinese characters on the left and right sides of a central fixation, and there was a variable onset delay between the two characters, ranging between 0 ms and 100 ms (in 20 ms intervals). The observers were instructed to indicate which of the two stimuli appeared first. Different pairs of stimuli valences were used in each experiment: positive and negative (Experiment 1), positive and neutral (Experiment 2), and negative and neutral (Experiment 3). The results of the first and second experiments indicated that people reliably perceived positive stimuli earlier than negative stimuli but not neutral stimuli; the third experiment showed that neutral stimuli were perceived earlier when presented with another negative one. Our findings revealed a general temporal prioritization towards semantically positive stimuli modulated by the strength of affective contrasts.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
University of Toronto (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.