The Role of Spatial Reference Frame in Implicit Distractor Location Learning

The ability to ignore distracting information plays an important role in many daily life situations. Recent research shows that when we become familiar with features of a distracting stimulus, such as its likely location, we can better ignore it, allegedly because the brain implicitly learns where in the environment distraction is likely to occur. In this study, we examined whether implicit distractor learning is environment-centered and/or depends on the viewer’s perspective. To this end, participants (n=29) performed an additional-singleton visual-search task, displayed on a monitor lying flat on a table. In this task, unbeknownst to the participants, the singleton distractor appeared more often at one of the search locations (high-probable location) during a training phase, to induce distractor location learning. In a subsequent test phase, participants moved 90 degrees around the table, changing their viewpoint, and the distractor regularity was removed. Thus, in the test phase, the distractor could now appear on the previously likely distractor location in the environment, on the previously likely distractor location from their own new viewpoint, or at other previously low probability locations. Initial analyses showed a robust capture effect in singleton-present trials during the training phase, that was significantly reduced when the singleton distractor occurred at the high-probable location, demonstrating distractor-location learning. In the test phase, the effect of the previous distractor location showed trend-level significance, with numerically faster responses when the singleton distractor occurred at the viewer-centered location, but with no clear difference between the environment-centered and the other non-learned distractor locations. These first findings suggest that distractor-location learning may be predominantly viewer-centered, possibly entailing implicit learning of how one should not move their attention from an egocentric perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.586
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Spatial Reference Frame in Implicit Distractor Location Learning

Heleen A. Slagter, Freek van Ede, Litian Chen
Journal of Vision
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
article

The Role of Spatial Reference Frame in Implicit Distractor Location Learning

Heleen A. Slagter, Freek van Ede, Litian Chen
article en

Abstract

The ability to ignore distracting information plays an important role in many daily life situations. Recent research shows that when we become familiar with features of a distracting stimulus, such as its likely location, we can better ignore it, allegedly because the brain implicitly learns where in the environment distraction is likely to occur. In this study, we examined whether implicit distractor learning is environment-centered and/or depends on the viewer’s perspective. To this end, participants (n=29) performed an additional-singleton visual-search task, displayed on a monitor lying flat on a table. In this task, unbeknownst to the participants, the singleton distractor appeared more often at one of the search locations (high-probable location) during a training phase, to induce distractor location learning. In a subsequent test phase, participants moved 90 degrees around the table, changing their viewpoint, and the distractor regularity was removed. Thus, in the test phase, the distractor could now appear on the previously likely distractor location in the environment, on the previously likely distractor location from their own new viewpoint, or at other previously low probability locations. Initial analyses showed a robust capture effect in singleton-present trials during the training phase, that was significantly reduced when the singleton distractor occurred at the high-probable location, demonstrating distractor-location learning. In the test phase, the effect of the previous distractor location showed trend-level significance, with numerically faster responses when the singleton distractor occurred at the viewer-centered location, but with no clear difference between the environment-centered and the other non-learned distractor locations. These first findings suggest that distractor-location learning may be predominantly viewer-centered, possibly entailing implicit learning of how one should not move their attention from an egocentric perspective.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.