The multidimensional representation of facial attributes.

As primates, our social behaviour is shaped by our ability to read the faces of the people around us. Our current understanding of the neural processes governing ‘face reading’ comes primarily from studies that have focused on the recognition of facial expressions. However, these studies have often used staged facial expressions, potentially disconnecting facial morphology from genuine emotion and circumstance. Therefore, a reliance on staged stimuli might be obscuring our understanding of how faces are perceived and recognised during everyday life. Here our goal was to identify the core dimensions underlying the mental representation of expressive facial stimuli using a data driven approach. In two behavioural experiments (Experiment 1, N = 940; Experiment 2, N = 489), we used an odd-one-out task to measure perceived dissimilarity within two sets of faces; 900 highly-variable, naturalistic, expressive stimuli from the Wild Faces Database (Long, Peluso, et al., 2023 Sci Reports, 13: 5383) and 670 highly-controlled, staged stimuli from the NimStim database (Tottenham, Tanaka, et al., 2009 Psychiatry Res, 168: 3). Using Representational Similarity Analysis, we mapped the representation of the faces in the Wild and NimStim databases, separately, and compared these representations to behavioral and computational models. We also employed the state-of-the-art VICE model (Muttenthaler, Zheng, et al., 2022 Adv Neural Inf Process Syst) to uncover the dimensions that best explained behaviour towards each of the face sets. Collectively, these results indicate that the representation of the Wild Faces was best characterised by perceived social categories, such as gender, and emotional valence. By comparison, facial expression category explained more of the perceived dissimilarity among the NimStim faces than the Wild Faces. These findings underscore the importance of stimulus selection in visual cognition research and suggest that, under naturalistic circumstances, humans spontaneously use information about both social category and expression to evaluate faces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.662
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The multidimensional representation of facial attributes.

Chris I. Baker, Tijl Grootswagers, Amanda K. Robinson, Charles Zheng et al.
Journal of Vision
Face recognition and analysis
article

The multidimensional representation of facial attributes.

Chris I. Baker, Tijl Grootswagers, Amanda K. Robinson, Charles Zheng, Jessica Taubert, Shruti Japee, Houqiu Long, Francisco Pereira
article en

Abstract

As primates, our social behaviour is shaped by our ability to read the faces of the people around us. Our current understanding of the neural processes governing ‘face reading’ comes primarily from studies that have focused on the recognition of facial expressions. However, these studies have often used staged facial expressions, potentially disconnecting facial morphology from genuine emotion and circumstance. Therefore, a reliance on staged stimuli might be obscuring our understanding of how faces are perceived and recognised during everyday life. Here our goal was to identify the core dimensions underlying the mental representation of expressive facial stimuli using a data driven approach. In two behavioural experiments (Experiment 1, N = 940; Experiment 2, N = 489), we used an odd-one-out task to measure perceived dissimilarity within two sets of faces; 900 highly-variable, naturalistic, expressive stimuli from the Wild Faces Database (Long, Peluso, et al., 2023 Sci Reports, 13: 5383) and 670 highly-controlled, staged stimuli from the NimStim database (Tottenham, Tanaka, et al., 2009 Psychiatry Res, 168: 3). Using Representational Similarity Analysis, we mapped the representation of the faces in the Wild and NimStim databases, separately, and compared these representations to behavioral and computational models. We also employed the state-of-the-art VICE model (Muttenthaler, Zheng, et al., 2022 Adv Neural Inf Process Syst) to uncover the dimensions that best explained behaviour towards each of the face sets. Collectively, these results indicate that the representation of the Wild Faces was best characterised by perceived social categories, such as gender, and emotional valence. By comparison, facial expression category explained more of the perceived dissimilarity among the NimStim faces than the Wild Faces. These findings underscore the importance of stimulus selection in visual cognition research and suggest that, under naturalistic circumstances, humans spontaneously use information about both social category and expression to evaluate faces.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
The University of Queensland (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Face recognition and analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.