Identifying Component Processes in Perceptual Learning with Non-parametric Bayesian Modeling of the Learning Curve in a Yes-No task with Method of Constant Stimuli

Perceptual learning is a multifaceted process that may involve general learning, between-session forgetting or consolidation, and within-session rapid relearning and adaptation (Yang et al., 2022). The traditional learning curve, often derived from aggregated data in blocks or sessions comprising tens or hundreds of trials in most perceptual learning studies, may have obscured certain component processes. In a previous study, we developed three non-parametric inference procedures to estimate fine-grained contrast threshold learning curves in a Gabor orientation identification task, measured with the staircase procedure. In this work, we introduce a non-parametric Bayesian inference procedure to estimate the posterior distribution of the block d' learning curve in Yes-No tasks measured with the method of constant stimuli, incorporating varying block sizes. The model assumes the decision criterion as a constant likelihood ratio across all blocks for each subject. We applied the method with three block sizes (10, 35, and 100 trials/block) to a global motion same-different judgement task conducted over 3500 trials across five sessions (Yang et al., 2022). The goodness of fit to the data increased with the temporal resolution of the analysis. Model comparisons, based on the Bayesian Predictive Information Criterion (BPIC), identified the 10 trials/block model as the best fit. When fitting a multi-component generative model of perceptual learning (Zhao et al., submitted) to the average d' learning curves at the group level, we uncovered general learning, between-session forgetting and within-session rapid relearning with 10 and 35 trials/block. In contrast, the original study with 100 trials/block only identified general learning and within-session rapid relearning. The non-parametric Bayesian inference procedure offers a versatile framework for high-temporal resolution assessment of the component processes in perceptual learning across diverse tasks and testing paradigms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.750
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Component Processes in Perceptual Learning with Non-parametric Bayesian Modeling of the Learning Curve in a Yes-No task with Method of Constant Stimuli

Zhong‐Lin Lu, Barbara Anne Dosher, Yukai Zhao, Chang‐Bing Huang et al.
Journal of Vision
Neural Networks and Applications
article

Identifying Component Processes in Perceptual Learning with Non-parametric Bayesian Modeling of the Learning Curve in a Yes-No task with Method of Constant Stimuli

Zhong‐Lin Lu, Barbara Anne Dosher, Yukai Zhao, Chang‐Bing Huang, Fang-Fang Yan, Jia Yang
article en

Abstract

Perceptual learning is a multifaceted process that may involve general learning, between-session forgetting or consolidation, and within-session rapid relearning and adaptation (Yang et al., 2022). The traditional learning curve, often derived from aggregated data in blocks or sessions comprising tens or hundreds of trials in most perceptual learning studies, may have obscured certain component processes. In a previous study, we developed three non-parametric inference procedures to estimate fine-grained contrast threshold learning curves in a Gabor orientation identification task, measured with the staircase procedure. In this work, we introduce a non-parametric Bayesian inference procedure to estimate the posterior distribution of the block d' learning curve in Yes-No tasks measured with the method of constant stimuli, incorporating varying block sizes. The model assumes the decision criterion as a constant likelihood ratio across all blocks for each subject. We applied the method with three block sizes (10, 35, and 100 trials/block) to a global motion same-different judgement task conducted over 3500 trials across five sessions (Yang et al., 2022). The goodness of fit to the data increased with the temporal resolution of the analysis. Model comparisons, based on the Bayesian Predictive Information Criterion (BPIC), identified the 10 trials/block model as the best fit. When fitting a multi-component generative model of perceptual learning (Zhao et al., submitted) to the average d' learning curves at the group level, we uncovered general learning, between-session forgetting and within-session rapid relearning with 10 and 35 trials/block. In contrast, the original study with 100 trials/block only identified general learning and within-session rapid relearning. The non-parametric Bayesian inference procedure offers a versatile framework for high-temporal resolution assessment of the component processes in perceptual learning across diverse tasks and testing paradigms.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of California, Irvine (US), New York University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Neural Networks and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.