Facilitation of visual and haptic recognition after multisensory active control of real 3D objects.

3D objects are often studied in multisensory environments and subsequently recognized through multiple senses. Although several studies have revealed faster recognition of novel objects after active control during exploration relative to passive viewing, the effects that haptic information during active study may have on recognition has not been tested in these paradigms. Here we investigated the effect of active manual control, involving multisensory object information at study, on both unisensory visual and unisensory haptic object recognition. We predicted that regardless of test and exploratory condition, multisensory active exploration of 3D objects would result in more accurate recognition relative to other groups without 3D multisensory information during study. 3D objects were studied through either 3D multisensory active exploration, unisensory passive viewing of a yoked video, multisensory study where the visual information was 2D (seeing one’s own actions via a computer screen), multisensory study where the 2D visual information was a video of another participant’s exploration or unisensory haptic exploration. Participants subsequently recognized objects either visually on a computer or through haptic exploration of 3D objects (without vision). Haptic test results revealed superior accuracy following multisensory active exploration relative to those who studied objects with unisensory haptics, and who viewed replayed multisensory actions through a computer screen. Multisensory active study facilitated more accurate recognition during the visual test relative to all other groups. Haptic test scores were higher than visual test scores, reflecting the efficacy of haptics during test. Overall, multisensory study of the actual 3D objects resulted in higher accuracy than multisensory study when the visual information was presented through a computer screen (in real time), reflecting the 3D over 2D dominance in the visual modality. We conclude active study of 3D objects with direct vision and haptics facilitates the most efficient recognition, both for subsequent visual and haptic testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.661
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facilitation of visual and haptic recognition after multisensory active control of real 3D objects.

Karin H. James, Hellen Kyler
Journal of Vision
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Facilitation of visual and haptic recognition after multisensory active control of real 3D objects.

Karin H. James, Hellen Kyler
article en

Abstract

3D objects are often studied in multisensory environments and subsequently recognized through multiple senses. Although several studies have revealed faster recognition of novel objects after active control during exploration relative to passive viewing, the effects that haptic information during active study may have on recognition has not been tested in these paradigms. Here we investigated the effect of active manual control, involving multisensory object information at study, on both unisensory visual and unisensory haptic object recognition. We predicted that regardless of test and exploratory condition, multisensory active exploration of 3D objects would result in more accurate recognition relative to other groups without 3D multisensory information during study. 3D objects were studied through either 3D multisensory active exploration, unisensory passive viewing of a yoked video, multisensory study where the visual information was 2D (seeing one’s own actions via a computer screen), multisensory study where the 2D visual information was a video of another participant’s exploration or unisensory haptic exploration. Participants subsequently recognized objects either visually on a computer or through haptic exploration of 3D objects (without vision). Haptic test results revealed superior accuracy following multisensory active exploration relative to those who studied objects with unisensory haptics, and who viewed replayed multisensory actions through a computer screen. Multisensory active study facilitated more accurate recognition during the visual test relative to all other groups. Haptic test scores were higher than visual test scores, reflecting the efficacy of haptics during test. Overall, multisensory study of the actual 3D objects resulted in higher accuracy than multisensory study when the visual information was presented through a computer screen (in real time), reflecting the 3D over 2D dominance in the visual modality. We conclude active study of 3D objects with direct vision and haptics facilitates the most efficient recognition, both for subsequent visual and haptic testing.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.