Detecting Moving Objects During Self-motion

As we move through the world, the pattern of light projected on our eyes is complex and dynamic, yet we are still able to distinguish moving and stationary objects. One might hypothesize that this is achieved by detecting discontinuities in the spatial pattern of velocities, however this computation is also sensitive to velocity discontinuities at boundaries of stationary objects. We instead propose that humans make use of the specific constraints that self-motion imposes on retinal velocities. When an eye translates and rotates within a rigid 3D world, the velocity at each location on the retina is constrained to a line segment in the 2D space of retinal velocities (Longuet, Higgins, Prazdny 1980). The slope and intercept of this segment is determined by the eye’s translation and rotation, and the position along the segment is determined by depth of the scene. Since all possible velocities arising from a rigid world must lie on this segment, velocities not on the segment must correspond to moving objects. We hypothesize that humans make use of these constraints, by partially inferring self-motion based on the global pattern of retinal velocities, and using deviations of local velocity from the resulting constraint lines to detect moving objects. Using a head-mounted virtual reality device we simulated a translation forward in different virtual environments: one consisting of textured cubes above a textured ground plane, and one of scattered depth-matched dots. Participants had to determine if a cued cube/dot moved relative to the scene. Consistent with the hypothesis, we found that performance depended on the deviation of the object velocity from the constraint segment, not on the difference between retinal velocities of the object and its surround. Our findings contrast with previous inconclusive results, that relied on an impoverished stimulus with a limited field of view.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.761
Primary Topic
Advanced Vision and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Moving Objects During Self-motion

Hope Lutwak, Bas Rokers, Eero P. Simoncelli
Journal of Vision
Advanced Vision and Imaging
article

Detecting Moving Objects During Self-motion

Hope Lutwak, Bas Rokers, Eero P. Simoncelli
article en

Abstract

As we move through the world, the pattern of light projected on our eyes is complex and dynamic, yet we are still able to distinguish moving and stationary objects. One might hypothesize that this is achieved by detecting discontinuities in the spatial pattern of velocities, however this computation is also sensitive to velocity discontinuities at boundaries of stationary objects. We instead propose that humans make use of the specific constraints that self-motion imposes on retinal velocities. When an eye translates and rotates within a rigid 3D world, the velocity at each location on the retina is constrained to a line segment in the 2D space of retinal velocities (Longuet, Higgins, Prazdny 1980). The slope and intercept of this segment is determined by the eye’s translation and rotation, and the position along the segment is determined by depth of the scene. Since all possible velocities arising from a rigid world must lie on this segment, velocities not on the segment must correspond to moving objects. We hypothesize that humans make use of these constraints, by partially inferring self-motion based on the global pattern of retinal velocities, and using deviations of local velocity from the resulting constraint lines to detect moving objects. Using a head-mounted virtual reality device we simulated a translation forward in different virtual environments: one consisting of textured cubes above a textured ground plane, and one of scattered depth-matched dots. Participants had to determine if a cued cube/dot moved relative to the scene. Consistent with the hypothesis, we found that performance depended on the deviation of the object velocity from the constraint segment, not on the difference between retinal velocities of the object and its surround. Our findings contrast with previous inconclusive results, that relied on an impoverished stimulus with a limited field of view.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Flatiron Health (United States) (US), Flatiron Institute (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Advanced Vision and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Detecting Moving Objects During Self-motion — Hope Lutwak, Bas Rokers, et al. · Journal of Vision (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS