Learning to Suppress Color Singletons via Feature-Based Regularities

Do salient items, such as uniquely colored stimuli, automatically capture our attention? This question has been heatedly debated for decades, traditionally spurred on by two competing accounts: stimulus-driven and goal-driven. According to stimulus-driven accounts, salient items, such as color singleton distractors, have the power to automatically capture attention. In contrast, goal-driven accounts posit that only items matching the observers top-down attentional set will capture attention. This failed dichotomy misses another important source of attentional control: an observer’s previous experience or selection history. One such example of selection history is the finding that color singletons appearing in a frequent color result in less capture than singletons presented in less frequent colors. But what is the nature of this selection history? The current study varied exposure to feature-based statistical regularities to assess how they influence the control of attention. High- and low-frequency singleton distractors were presented either within blocks, to test “short-lived” regularities, such as intertrial priming, or between blocks, to test “longer-lived” regularities, such as attentional control settings. We found that capture by the high probable color was suppressed relative to capture by the low probable colors, and this learned suppression was evident for both the within- and between-block manipulations. These findings suggest that learning to suppress a distractor feature based on statistical regularities is robust and longer-lived.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.738
Primary Topic
Color Science and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning to Suppress Color Singletons via Feature-Based Regularities

Brad T. Stilwell, Brian A. Anderson
Journal of Vision
Color Science and Applications
article

Learning to Suppress Color Singletons via Feature-Based Regularities

Brad T. Stilwell, Brian A. Anderson
article en

Abstract

Do salient items, such as uniquely colored stimuli, automatically capture our attention? This question has been heatedly debated for decades, traditionally spurred on by two competing accounts: stimulus-driven and goal-driven. According to stimulus-driven accounts, salient items, such as color singleton distractors, have the power to automatically capture attention. In contrast, goal-driven accounts posit that only items matching the observers top-down attentional set will capture attention. This failed dichotomy misses another important source of attentional control: an observer’s previous experience or selection history. One such example of selection history is the finding that color singletons appearing in a frequent color result in less capture than singletons presented in less frequent colors. But what is the nature of this selection history? The current study varied exposure to feature-based statistical regularities to assess how they influence the control of attention. High- and low-frequency singleton distractors were presented either within blocks, to test “short-lived” regularities, such as intertrial priming, or between blocks, to test “longer-lived” regularities, such as attentional control settings. We found that capture by the high probable color was suppressed relative to capture by the low probable colors, and this learned suppression was evident for both the within- and between-block manipulations. These findings suggest that learning to suppress a distractor feature based on statistical regularities is robust and longer-lived.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Mitchell Institute (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Color Science and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.