An inhibitory mechanism prevents outdated actions of eye and hand movements

Sequences of saccadic eye movements are inhibited after salient changes, even when they are task-irrelevant [Reingold & Stampe, 2002]. This phenomenon of saccadic inhibition is considered an adaptive mechanism, preventing outdated movements while the change is evaluated [Stanford & Salinas, 2018]. Here, we show that inhibition extends to sequences of hand movements, implying that a global signal inhibits action execution across motor systems until the evaluation of changes is complete and new movement plans have been established. In two experiments executed online on participants’ smartphone touchscreens, we evaluated hand movement rates after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes. Participants collected a series of six randomly jittered movement targets by tapping on them. The task-relevant change (shown in 50% of all trials) was a displacement of the movement targets. The task-irrelevant change (shown in an independently chosen 50% of all trials) was a brief flash. The location and contrast of the flash varied between the experiments. Movement rates dropped below baseline after both task-relevant and irrelevant changes. Actions after the inhibition reflected a complete movement update, never an average of two responses. This suggests that the evaluation of the change continued throughout the inhibition. In a lab-based replication of the key results, we assessed the reliability of the timing of the online measurements and collected eye movement behavior. The combined data confirms that trials in which eye movements were likely to be inhibited were also more likely to show inhibited hand movements. We suggest that upon detection of a salient change, any overt motor output is suppressed – regardless of the motor system – to prevent the execution of outdated actions. This mechanism could reduce the number of incorrect motor actions without disrupting the cognitive processes evaluating the state of the world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.600
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An inhibitory mechanism prevents outdated actions of eye and hand movements

Clara Kuper, Martin Rolfs
Journal of Vision
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

An inhibitory mechanism prevents outdated actions of eye and hand movements

Clara Kuper, Martin Rolfs
article en

Abstract

Sequences of saccadic eye movements are inhibited after salient changes, even when they are task-irrelevant [Reingold & Stampe, 2002]. This phenomenon of saccadic inhibition is considered an adaptive mechanism, preventing outdated movements while the change is evaluated [Stanford & Salinas, 2018]. Here, we show that inhibition extends to sequences of hand movements, implying that a global signal inhibits action execution across motor systems until the evaluation of changes is complete and new movement plans have been established. In two experiments executed online on participants’ smartphone touchscreens, we evaluated hand movement rates after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes. Participants collected a series of six randomly jittered movement targets by tapping on them. The task-relevant change (shown in 50% of all trials) was a displacement of the movement targets. The task-irrelevant change (shown in an independently chosen 50% of all trials) was a brief flash. The location and contrast of the flash varied between the experiments. Movement rates dropped below baseline after both task-relevant and irrelevant changes. Actions after the inhibition reflected a complete movement update, never an average of two responses. This suggests that the evaluation of the change continued throughout the inhibition. In a lab-based replication of the key results, we assessed the reliability of the timing of the online measurements and collected eye movement behavior. The combined data confirms that trials in which eye movements were likely to be inhibited were also more likely to show inhibited hand movements. We suggest that upon detection of a salient change, any overt motor output is suppressed – regardless of the motor system – to prevent the execution of outdated actions. This mechanism could reduce the number of incorrect motor actions without disrupting the cognitive processes evaluating the state of the world.

Journal of VisionVol. 24(10)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Brain (Germany) (DE), Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.